• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: ExtraCare Charitable Trust Bushfield Court

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Oxford Street, Bilston, West Midlands, WV14 0PX (01902) 493858

Provided and run by:
The ExtraCare Charitable Trust

All Inspections

3 August 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 3 August 2016 and was announced.

The ExtraCare Charitable Trust Bushfield Court provides personal care for people living in a purpose built scheme where there are individual flats and bungalows with shared facilities. These included a restaurant area, lounge areas, fitness facilities and activity rooms. There were 46 people receiving personal care when we inspected. There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People who used the service and their representatives spoke highly of the registered manager and staff. All staff we spoke with were highly motivated and committed to ensuring people had the best quality of life possible.

People’s safety was taken seriously by the registered manager and staff who understood their responsibilities to protect people's health and well-being. Staff knew what action to take if they suspected abuse. Risks to people who used the service and staff safety both internally and externally to the person's home had been assessed and recorded, with measures put in place to manage any hazards identified. People told us they received their medicines as prescribed and at the correct time. They also felt that if they needed extra pain relief or other medicines these were provided. People told us there were enough staff to support them when they needed or wanted help or assistance.

Where needed people were supported to eat and drink enough to remain healthy. People had access to other healthcare professionals that provided treatment, advice and guidance to support their health needs.

Staff were supported to develop and progress within their role by the provider and registered manager. People received consistent support from the same staff who knew them well. The provider employed staff dedicated to people’s well-being and who understood the complexities of supporting people living with dementia or mental health needs.

We received very positive feedback about the care, the provider and the staff. People who used the service and their relatives felt staff went out of their way to support them in a kind, caring manner and went above and beyond what was expected to meet their needs. Staff developed positive, respectful relationships with people and were kind and caring in their approach.

People and relatives said skilled staff provided excellent care which met people's individual needs. This was confirmed by health professionals who told us they had evidenced people had achieved very positive outcomes whilst using the service particularly around increased confidence and independence. People were supported to plan and achieve goals and objectives relating to their independence and social life. People’s confidence and self-belief were supported by additional staff that worked with them to do this.

The provider and registered manager were committed to providing a high quality service to people and to its continuous development as an organisation. Feedback from people, their representatives and others was continually sought and used as an opportunity to improve the service people received. The provider and registered manager also demonstrated strong links with the local community.

13 November 2013

During a routine inspection

During our inspection we spoke with 10 people, two visitors, four members of staff, an external professional and the manager. We looked at five people's care records.

Personal care was delivered by staff within an ExtraCare scheme where people held tenancies for flats set within the scheme's premises. People also had access to day services provided by the scheme which are not regulated by us.

We found that people's consent to care was sought. Where people did not have the capacity to consent, appropriate steps were taken to make decisions in their best interests and to protect their rights.

People received care which supported their needs. People told us they received the assistance they required. One person said, 'I can't fault the care'.

Some people were supported to take their prescribed medicines. However, we did find some recording errors in medication records.

Staff were subject to robust checks and recruitment processes to ensure they were suitably experienced to care for people. One person told us, 'They know their job. They approach you in a nice manner'.

The provider carried out audits to ensure people received care which was safe and which met their needs.

24 July 2012

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection to check on the care and welfare of people. On the day of the inspection visit, 51 people were receiving personal care services at Bushfield Court. The service was not aware that we would be carrying out an inspection on the day. We spoke to six people, four staff, and a manager from a different location.

We saw that people wore clothing that reflected individual choices and preferences. We saw that staff promoted people's independence throughout the day and supported people appropriately. We saw that staff asked people about their care needs. This meant that people had the opportunity to be involved in their care and treatment decisions.

We saw that there were positive interactions between staff and people. People told us that staff were on time and delivered all the personal care needs they wanted. This meant that people received care that met their needs.

We found that arrangements were in place to ensure that any allegations of abuse were identified, managed, and reported appropriately.

We found that staff were supported through observed practices, appraisals, training and regular staff meetings.

Systems were in place to ensure that shortfalls in the home were identified to make improvements in the way that the service was run.

The provider may find it useful to note that improvements in maintaining care records would continue to ensure that people were receiving consistent and appropriate care.