• Hospice service

North London Hospice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

47 Woodside Avenue, North Finchley, London, N12 8TF (020) 8343 8841

Provided and run by:
North London Hospice

All Inspections

11 October 2016

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on the 11, 13 and 17 October 2016 and was unannounced. The previous inspection took place on the 19 December 2013 and met legal requirements.

North London Hospice is a registered charity which provides a range of services including inpatient, outpatient, community and day services for adults with life limiting illnesses and palliative care needs for people in the London boroughs of Barnet, Enfield and Haringey. The hospice has an 18 bed inpatient unit. There is also a multi-professional community palliative care team which provides symptom control advice, psychological, spiritual and emotional support, and a palliative care support service based at the hospice that provides practical care for approximately 200 people who live in Barnet, Enfield and Haringey.

Other services offered by the hospice included; complementary therapies, outpatients, physiotherapy, spiritual support and bereavement support for families, friends and carers of people using its services.

The service had a registered manager who was the Director of Clinical Services of the hospice. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission [CQC] to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager was supported in the managing and running of the services by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Board of Trustees, Medical Director and other management staff.

People were supported to be fully involved and to take the lead in all decisions about the care and support they received. People were positive about the care and support they received from staff. People said their right to privacy was fully protected, and told us they were always treated with dignity and great respect by all staff. They told us staff were kind and listened to them and respected their wishes and preferences regarding their care and support needs. Each person had a specific up to date plan of care which provided information about their medical, physical, emotional, social and spiritual needs. People’s specific wishes were recorded in advance care plans [ACPs].

People’s physical, emotional, social and spiritual needs were met by a multi-disciplinary team [MDT]. The staff and volunteers we spoke with from all the services provided by the hospice spoke positively about their jobs. They had a very good understanding of their roles and responsibilities and cared very much about the people they supported and were committed to deliver a high standard of service.

Staff and volunteers received the training and learning they needed to be skilled and competent to provide people who often had complex needs with the care and support they needed. Some volunteers had the opportunity to complete specific training to develop their skills in supporting people with their emotional and spiritual needs.

Management and staff understood their responsibility to comply with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards which meant they were working within the law to support people who may lack capacity to make their own decisions. Staff knew when safeguards needed to be in place to protect people who were unable to make decisions about their care. Staff established consent from people before providing care.

Risks to people's safety were appropriately assessed, managed and monitored to minimise the risk of people being harmed and to keep them safe. People told us they felt safe when receiving care and support from the hospice services. Staff received the training they needed to protect people and knew how to recognise signs of abuse and how to raise an alert if they had any concerns.

There was a system in place to record, assess and monitor accidents and incidents. Incidents were analysed to minimise avoidable risks and the risk of re-occurrence.

The hospice environment was welcoming, clean, warm and well lit. Systems were in place to maintain the safety of the hospice and its services. This included addressing maintenance issues, fire prevention and carrying out health and safety checks of equipment and the building.

Systems and processes were in place to monitor standards of hygiene and control of infection and to make improvements when needed.

Systems were in place to make sure people’s medicines were managed and administered safely. People’s medicines were reviewed frequently to ensure they met each person’s specific needs.

The provider's staff recruitment process made sure that staff and volunteers were suitable to work with people who needed care and support. Staffing levels and skills combination ensured enough staff were available to meet people’s varied and often complex care, treatment and support needs in a personalised and safe manner.

People told us they enjoyed the meals, were offered choices and had their individual food preferences catered for. Nutritional assessments were undertaken to identify risks associated with poor nutrition and hydration so these could be minimised.

Inpatients and outpatients had the opportunity to participate in one to one and group activities to help minimise social isolation and promote their well-being.

The hospice was responsive to people’s feedback and proactive in working in partnership with a number of external professionals and organisations to develop best practice and provide people and those important to them with a range of services that met their individual needs including advice and emotional support.

People using services and their families and friends were provided with a range of information about the hospice services. A variety of leaflets were also available which included details about each of the hospice services, therapies, medical interventions and bereavement.

People knew what to do if they had a complaint. They were confident that they would be listened to and any concerns they raised would be addressed appropriately. Staff were committed to learning from people’s experiences and made improvements to the services when this was required.

The registered manager and other senior staff showed clear lines of responsibility and leadership. They and Trustees demonstrated a strong commitment to provide people with a safe and caring service and also to develop and improve the hospice services when required so people benefitted from effective services that met their individual needs.

A range of comprehensive checks and monitoring systems including regular inpatient and management meetings where all aspects of the services were discussed and reviewed were in place to monitor and improve the quality of the services provided.

19 December 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two patients and five relatives on the day of our visit. They all told us they were happy with the care and treatment provided. For example, one relative told us 'I can't believe how lucky we have been coming here; staff take care of all of us.' Patients and relatives said they had been kept well informed about care and treatment. A relative said, 'we have had family meetings every three days and it has been brilliant, they say there is no such thing as a silly question.'

Relatives told us that staff communicated sensitively and compassionately with them. A patient said, 'the compassion of staff is unbelievable.' Relatives felt welcome at the hospice and could visit at any time. They described staff as 'marvellous', 'very caring' and 'very kind' and said that 'nothing was too much trouble for staff.'

Patients told us they felt safe using the service and had confidence in the staff. For example, a patient told us 'I definitely feel safe here, I was worried about something but I spoke to staff and felt much better.' Staff knew how to protect people and respond to concerns that someone was being abused.

Patients and relatives considered the service was clean and hygienic and there were effective systems in place to reduce the risk of infection.

Staff recruited to work in the service underwent checks ensure they were suitable and qualified to work at the service. Most records kept by the service were accurate and fit for purpose.

20 September 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two patients on the in-patient unit. They were both very positive about the care and treatment they had received. For example, one patient described the standard of care as 'superb' and said that staff had been 'wonderful'. They both said staff had respected their privacy and dignity. Patients were provided with information in relation to their admission and care. This included information on how to make a complaint.

Staff had been given support and training to enable them to deliver care and treatment to an appropriate standard. There was an effective system in place to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service provided.