• Care Home
  • Care home

Staveley House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

80 Greystone Lane, Dalton-in-furness, LA15 8QQ (01229) 468210

Provided and run by:
Abbeyfield Furness Extra Care Society Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 21 December 2021

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.

Inspection team

The inspection was carried out by one inspector.

Service and service type

Staveley House is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

This inspection was announced. There was a prevalence of COVID-19 in the geographical area at the time of the inspection and we needed to ensure it was safe and there were sufficient management staff available to support the inspection.

What we did before the inspection

We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority and commissioners who work with the service. We also looked at information we had received and held on our system about the service, this included notifications sent to us by the provider and information passed to us by members of the public.

We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections.

We used all this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with seven people who lived at Staveley House, seven members of care staff, the cook, registered manager and two maintenance personnel. We observed staff interaction with people. In addition, we reviewed a range of records. These included care records of two people, medication records, staff files in relation to recruitment and staff training records. We also reviewed a variety of records relating to the management of the service. We had a walk around the premises and looked at infection control measures.

After the inspection

We continued to seek clarification from the registered manager to validate evidence found. We looked at their quality assurance systems and training schedules for staff.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 21 December 2021

About the service

Staveley House is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care to older people. The service can support up to 40 people in one purpose-built building. At the time of the inspection there were 34 who lived at the home.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Staveley House was clean and hygienic. They had an infection prevention and control policy in place. There were sufficient staff to meet people’s care and support needs. Staff were employed following a thorough recruitment process. One staff member said, “I felt more confident after the support through the employment process.” People’s safety was at the centre of care delivery. Risks were assessed and carefully monitored to ensure individuals safety. People received their medicines safely.

People received support with their healthcare and nutritional needs. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. There was a programme of staff training and regular updates were in place for staff to attend and improve their skills.

We observed staff interactions with people living in the home and found them to be caring and they treated people with respect and kindness. One person said, “They are all so kind and patient I cannot say a bad word.”

Activities were varied, staff had worked hard with people to provide meaningful social activities to provide stimulation and exercise. There was a complaints process and procedure which people and relatives were aware of.

The management team had auditing systems to maintain ongoing oversight of the service and make improvements where necessary. Quality assurance processes ensured people were able to give their views of the service. We found the management team acted upon suggestions to improve the lives of people.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good (published 16 December 2019).

Why we inspected

We undertook this inspection as part of a random selection of services rated Good and Outstanding to test the reliability of our new monitoring approach.

Follow Up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.