Archived: The Rectory Care Home

Updated 20 February 2015

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 21 January 2015 and was unannounced. It was carried out by one adult social care inspector.

Before the inspection, the provider completed a Provider Information Return (PIR) This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. Unfortunately the registered manager was unable to submit the PIR due to technical difficulties but was able to share some of its contents with us during the inspection. We also looked at other information we held about the home before the inspection visit. At our last inspection of the service we did not identify any concerns with the care provided to people.

At the time of our visit there were 24 people living at the home. Some people were unable to fully express their views to us because of their dementia. We therefore spent time observing care practices and interactions between staff and people who lived at the home. We spoke with nine people, two relatives and four health and social care professionals. We also spoke with five members of staff and the registered manager. We looked at records which related to people’s individual care and to the running of the home. These included three care and support plans, three staff personnel files, records of staff training and medication administration records.

Updated 20 February 2015

This inspection was unannounced and took place on 21 January 2015.

The Rectory Care Home provides accommodation and personal care for up to 25 people. The home specialises in the care of people living with dementia.

There is a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The registered manager had a clear vision for the home. They said their philosophy was “To create an environment that constantly topped up people’s wellbeing.” Staff told us about the culture of the home and this showed the registered managers’ philosophy had been communicated throughout the staff group. One member of staff said “It’s all about treating everyone as an individual and helping them to be as happy as possible.” Another member of staff said “I think the ethos is to create a happy place. I think we achieve that most of the time.”

The atmosphere in the home was very warm and welcoming. There was lots of friendly banter and laughter throughout the day. One person told us “I like it that we have lots of laughs.” Another person said “There’s always a bit of fun to be had.”

Care was responsive to people’s needs and personalised to their wishes and preferences. People were supported to make choices about all aspects of their day to day lives. People were able to choose what time they got up, when they went to bed and how they spent their day.

There were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people’s needs in a relaxed and unhurried manner. Staff spent the majority of their time socialising with people. One member of staff told us “We’re not task focussed. Everything is about the people. It’s made clear when you start work the residents and their happiness always come first.”

Risks to people living at the home were minimised because the provider checked all new staff thoroughly to make sure they had the right skills and were safe to work with vulnerable people.

People told us staff were kind and caring. One person said “Everyone is happy and nice.” Another person told us “I’m alright here. All the girls are lovely to me.” Staff showed patience and understanding when supporting people.

People took part in a range of organised and impromptu activities. People were also involved in small tasks around the home such as laying tables for lunch and simple cooking. People were able to access the local community and the home had formed links with local groups and schools.

People’s nutritional needs were assessed to make sure they received a diet in line with their needs and wishes. At lunch time people were able to choose where they ate their meal and were shown different meals to assist them to make a choice. People were able to eat their meals in an unhurried manner and were provided with discreet assistance when they required support.

Staff monitored people’s physical and mental wellbeing. Where there were concerns about a person, health care professionals were involved to make sure people received appropriate care and treatment.

Staff ensured people were happy to be assisted and were consenting to their care and treatment. Throughout our visit people were offered choices and were given time to respond to questions and suggestions. Staff explained what was happening and gave people opportunities to refuse offers of help or support.

The registered manager sought people’s feedback and took action to address issues raised. Relatives and professionals told us the home encouraged them to share any concerns and worries with them. One relative told us “I could definitely talk to the manager if I had any concerns.”