• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Novus Care Limited - Reading

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

50 Beacontree Court, Gillette Way, Reading, RG2 0BS (0118) 986 3406

Provided and run by:
Novus Care Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 25 September 2019

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team

The inspection was completed two inspectors, a pharmacist inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service

Service and service type

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes.

The service did not have a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. However, the manager was in the process of submitting their application to be registered.

Notice of inspection

We gave the registered manager 1 weeks’ notice of the inspection visit to ensure the manager and senior staff were available to speak to us. We visited the office location on 14 August 2019. Inspection activity started on 14 August 2019 and ended on 22 August 2019.

What we did before inspection

We sought feedback from the local authority. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with five people who used the service and three relatives about their experience of care provided. We spoke with five members of staff including the manager, the operations manager, the two service directors and one member of care staff.

We reviewed a range of records. This included six people’s care records and six people’s medicines administration records. We looked at four staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. We reviewed a variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures, the provider’s complaints and compliments file, team meeting minutes, the staff roster system and the provider’s business continuity plan.

After the inspection

We reviewed further evidence sent to us by the provider. This included the provider’s medicines administration and medicines collection policies, spot checks, supervisions and competency assessments for staff in relation to medicines and the provider’s policies on infection control and safeguarding. We contacted six members of care staff. We received responses from four members of care staff. We also contacted three social care professionals. We did not receive any responses.

Overall inspection

Requires improvement

Updated 25 September 2019

About the service

Novus Care Limited is a home care service providing personal and nursing care to 30 people aged 65 and over, living in their own homes.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Medicines were not always managed safely. Staff were not always following the provider’s policies or national guidance. People’s care plans did not always have information about people’s prescribed medicines. Medicines risk assessments contained contradictory information.

We found a breach of regulation with respect to this.

Service management and leadership was inconsistent. Systems and processes to monitor and improve quality and safety in the service were not always effective.

We found a breach of regulation with respect to this.

People were protected from the risk of harm and abuse. There were enough suitably skilled and qualified staff to support people and meet their needs.

People were supported by skilled staff with the right knowledge and training.

Staff had developed caring bonds with people and upheld their privacy, dignity and independence.

People’s care and support met their needs and reflected their preferences. Staff upheld people’s human rights.

There were clear, robust processes for managing quality and safety in the service.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. Staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 24 September 2018 and this is the first inspection.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection. We inspect newly registered services within the first year after their registration.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the safe and well-led sections of this full report.

You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report.