19 February 2020
During a routine inspection
We carried out an inspection of Coldharbour Surgery on 19 February 2020 to follow up concerns identified at our last inspection undertaken on 8 January 2019 where the service was rated requires improvement for providing a service that was well led.
At that inspection we identified concerns around the oversight of clinical performance and nursing referrals, the process for recording the authorisation of repeat prescriptions, employment checks for staff and issues around the provision and monitoring of emergency equipment. The practice was rated as good overall but requires improvement for providing a service that was well led. We issued a requirement notice for breaches related to regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 regulations 2014. In addition, we recommended that the provider consider increasing the amount of quality improvement work, improve recording of significant event actions, create better oversight of two week wait referrals and implement a system to ensure policies were periodically reviewed.
At this inspection we found that the provider had taken action to address most areas of concern. Although the provider did not have all the recommended emergency medicines, they had ordered these prior to the inspection, and we saw evidence that regular checks were being undertaken of the medicine stocks and that the practice had defibrillators available at both sites. We reviewed the practice’s repeat prescribing process by looking at several records and found that the decision to authorise medicine was documented in each of the patient’s records. The practice had systems in place to check professional registrations and pre employment checks had been done for the member of staff employed since our last inspection. A system had been established to review nursing referrals. There were some areas where clinical performance was still below target and exception reporting higher than local and national averages however this had improved in most areas and the practice had good oversight of the patients where intervention was still required. In respect of the recommendations made at the last inspection; we saw that the practice had undertaken some quality improvement work and significant event action points were recorded in some but not all instances. There was a clear process for policy reviews and all but one we reviewed were up to date. The practice’s two week wait procedure was adequate and was subject to periodic review.
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We rated the practice as good for providing well-led services because:
- There were effective governance arrangements in most areas.
- The practice had undertaken analysis and made improvements in respect of targets for childhood immunisations. However further work was needed to meet targets and reduce exception reporting.
- The provider had adequate systems in place to assess, monitor and address risk in most areas. However, the provider was missing three emergency medicines on the day of the inspection; evidence was provided that these had been ordered prior to our inspection.
- The provider had a virtual patient participation group who were updated regularly about activities and developments within the practice. Mechanisms were in place to enable patients to feedback concerns and contribute ideas regarding the operation of the service.
- There was some evidence of continuous improvement or innovation.
- Staff provided positive feedback about working at the practice which indicated that there was a good working culture.
The areas where the provider should make improvements are:
- Continue to monitor performance and work to improve against national targets and reduce exception reporting; with particular focus on those with dementia.
- Periodically review guidance around emergency medicines and ensure that these are stocked or their absence risk assessed.
- Clearly document action taken in response to significant events and hold more frequent discussions with non-clinical staff about significant events and record these discussions.
- Update the practice’s safeguarding policy to reflect intercollegiate guidance and current internal processes.
- Increase the amount of clinical quality improvement activity.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care
Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.