• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Archived: Eye Doctors UK Limited

Overall: Inadequate read more about inspection ratings

59 Church Gate, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 1UE (01509) 239696

Provided and run by:
Eye Doctors UK Limited

Important: The provider of this service has requested a review of one or more of the ratings.

All Inspections

20 April 2021, 26th April 2021, 27th April 2021, 12 May 2021

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Inadequate overall. (Previous inspection November 2019 – Inadequate)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Inadequate

Are services effective? – Inspected but not rated

Are services caring? – Inspected but not rated

Are services responsive? – Inspected but not rated

Are services well-led? – Inspected but not rated

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Eye Doctors UK Limited in line with our inspection programme.Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, most of the evidence was reviewed and staff interviews were carried out remotely following the site visit on the 20th April 2021.

At our previous inspection in 2019 we found breaches of regulation in relation to regulation 12 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 (safe care and treatment) and regulation 17 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 (good governance). The requirement notices issued in November 2019 included issues around medical emergencies and emergency medicines, a lack of clinical audits completed at the service, ineffective governance and leadership and concerns around risks not being safely managed. Whilst we did see improvement in systems for emergency medicines, we were not able to assess that improvements had been made in relation to the rest of the breaches in regulation.

Due to the service only treating one patient since our previous inspection, we were unable to rate effective, caring, responsive and well led at this inspection. Therefore, the previous ratings from November 2019 will continue to apply to the service for these key questions.

Eye Doctors UK Limited is an independent health provider to treat skin conditions such as acne.

Dr Bhojani-Lynch the registered manager for the service. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • There had only been one patient treated at the service since our last inspection. Due to only having one consultation to review, we were unable to make a judgement that patients immediate and ongoing needs were always addressed as there was not enough evidence.
  • Safeguarding policies were in place, however, they were not relevant to the service.
  • There was no evidence of improvement within the service as there had been no significant events or complaints.
  • There was a lack of forward planning for the service.
  • There was no clear vision or strategy to deliver high quality care.
  • There was a lack of processes to identify and monitor risks.
  • There were no clinical audits completed at the service.
  • We saw no evidence of discrimination when making care and treatment decisions.
  • The service sought patient feedback following appointments.
  • Appointments were flexible around patient’s needs.

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

(Please see the specific details on action required at the end of this report).

This service was placed in special measures in November 2019 which will remain in place. Due to changes of registered manager within the service and the small number of patients seen, the provider has decided to become dormant. A further inspection will be conducted should the provider start operating again.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

6 November 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 6 November 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was not providing safe services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

There was insufficient evidence available to support any judgement in this key question.

Are services caring?

There was insufficient evidence available to support any judgement in this key question.

Are services responsive?

There was insufficient evidence available to support any judgement in this key question.

Are services well-led?

There was insufficient evidence available to support any judgement in this key question.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the practice service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

Medex House is a service intended to provide acne treatment to private patients.

The sole doctor at Medex House is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found that only two patients had been treated at Medex House since April 2017. No patients were on the premises during the course of the inspection.

As a result the provider had not undertaken any feedback or patient satisfaction exercise nor had any CQC feedback cards been completed.

Our key findings were:

  • The provider had a range of policies and protocols to support safe care and treatment.
  • The doctor and staff had received training appropriate to their role.
  • The provider had not undertaken an infection prevention and control audit.
  • No legionella risk assessment or five yearly fixed wiring check had been carried out.

We identified regulations that were not being met and the provider must:

  • Ensure that the premises are subject to a legionella risk assessment.
  • Ensure the premises have a five yearly check of the fixed electrical wiring.
  • Ensure that an infection prevention and control audit is undertaken.

You can see full details of the regulations not being met at the end of this report.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP Chief Inspector of General Practice

19 November 2013

During a routine inspection

Because the service was not yet operational we were unable to speak to people who had had experience of receiving treatment. We visited the provider's premises, we looked at their policies and procedures and we spoke with the registered manager.