• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Access Care Management Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 4, Basepoint Business And Innovation Centre, Caxton Close, Andover, Hampshire, SP10 3FG (01264) 326505

Provided and run by:
Access Care Management Limited

All Inspections

21 and 23 July 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection was announced and took place on the 21 and 23 July 2015.

Access Care Management is a small family run care service which provides personal care and support to people who live in their own homes across the country. People who receive the service include those living with dementia, people with disabilities such as cerebral palsy and those living with brain injuries. At the time of the inspection the service was providing personal care to 22 people. Care was provided by care workers who lived with people in their own homes.

Access Care Management has a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have a legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People using the service told us they felt safe. Care workers understood and followed guidance to recognise and address safeguarding concerns.

People’s safety was promoted because risks that may cause harm in their home and local community had been identified and managed. People were supported by care workers who encouraged them to remain independent. Appropriate risk assessments were in place to keep people safe.

Access Care Management did not directly employ care workers. Care workers were self-employed and registered with the service in order to deliver care. Recruitment procedures were not fully completed in order to protect people from the deployment of unsuitable care workers. The provider had not ensured that a full employment history had been obtained from care workers. This is required to make sure care workers can explain any gaps in employment when they have been working with adults who are vulnerable. However the provider however obtained character and professional references to ensure care workers suitability for the role.

People were protected from the unsafe administration of their medicines because care workers were trained to administer medicines safely. Care workers completed mandatory training to ensure that medicines were being administered, stored and disposed of correctly. These skills were reviewed on a regular basis by appropriately trained office staff to ensure that care workers were competent in the completion of their role.

People were supported by care workers to make their own decisions. Care workers were knowledgeable about the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005). The service worked with people, relatives and healthcare professionals when required to assess people’s capacity to make specific decisions for themselves. Care workers sought consent before carrying out care, treatment and support.

People were supported to eat and drink enough to maintain their nutritional and hydration needs. People told us they were able to choose their meals. Records showed people’s food and drink preferences were documented in care plans and were known by care workers.

People’s health needs were met as the care workers and registered manager promptly engaged with other healthcare agencies and professionals to maintain people’s safety and welfare.

Care workers demonstrated that they knew and understood the needs of the people they were supporting. People told us that their care was provided to a good standard. The registered manager and care workers were able to identify and discuss the importance of maintaining people’s respect and privacy at all times. People were encouraged and supported by care workers to make choices about their care.

Care plans were personalised to each individual. They contained detailed information to assist care workers to provide care in a manner that respected that person’s individual needs and wishes. Relatives told us and records showed they were actively encouraged to be involved at the care planning stage, during regular review and when their family member’s health needs changed.

People knew how to complain and told us they were happy to do so if this was required. Procedures were in place for the registered manager to monitor, investigate and respond to complaints in an effective way. People, relatives and care workers were encouraged to provide feedback on the quality of the service during regular telephone conversations with the manager and office staff.

The provider’s values were communicated to people and care workers. Care worker understood these and people told us these standards were evidenced in the way care was delivered.

The registered manager and care workers promoted a culture which focused on providing person centred care. People were assisted by support workers who were encouraged to raise concerns with the registered manager and office staff. The provider had a routine and regular quality monitoring process in place to assess the quality of the service being provided. This open and supportive process allowed for people, relatives and the care workers to provide feedback.

Care workers told us they felt supported by the registered manager and office staff.

We found a breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

5 December 2013

During a routine inspection

Following our inspection at the agency's office we telephoned and spoke with six people who were using the service, or their relatives. We also spoke with five staff members and the manager. People were highly complimentary about the care and support they were receiving. They told us they had the "same girls who came to help" them with their care. A person told us they had the same care worker for five years and they were 'very pleased with them'. Another person said they were 'very lucky' and the care was 'excellent'. A relative told us they usually had the same care workers who rotated and this was 'very good 'for their relative as it provided continuity in their care.

Arrangements were in place to meet the needs of people. We found the care plans were detailed and recently reviewed to reflect people's needs. Risk assessments of the environment and needs' assessment were completed prior to care being provided.

There was a process to seek the views of people. An action plan was developed to address any issues identified from the surveys. We saw there was an effective quality assurance system in place and people who use the service were asked for their views about the care and treatment they received.

There was a complaints process in place. Records of complaints were maintained. People told us they would contact the office and a person said the manager encouraged people to raise any concerns they may have and took action to resolve them.