• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

English Institute of Sport - Bath

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, Avon, BA2 7AY (01225) 466446

Provided and run by:
UK Sports Institute

All Inspections

18 May 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Requires improvement overall.

The service was registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) on 20 December 2011 and this is the first rated inspection since registration. The service was inspected but not rated on 25 June 2012.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Requires improvement

Are services effective? – Requires improvement

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Requires improvement

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at English Institute of Sport – Bath as part of our planned inspection programme.

The English Institute of Sport – Bath is part of a wider organisation, The English Institute of Sport Limited, which provides Sports Medicine and Science disciplines to elite athletes who receive funding from UK Sport. The doctors provide routine consultations to do with both sports’ injury and illness to the athletes.

This service is registered with the CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some general exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. The services provided at this location which are not in scope include: physiotherapy and psychological therapies such as counselling.

The location at the time of inspection did not have a registered manager in place. The provider had submitted an application for a new registered manager which was awaiting approval by us. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations regarding how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • English Institute of Sport – Bath is a government funded organisation that provides services that have been purchased by National Governing Bodies for named athletes who are subsequently privately insured.
  • The service had developed materials for service users which explained medical procedures and clearly outlined the recovery process.
  • There were systems, processes in place to safeguard athletes from abuse.
  • The service had systems in place to identify, investigate and learn from incidents relating to the safety of athletes and staff members.
  • Information about care and treatment was comprehensive and accessible.
  • The premises were safe and suited to the provision of care.
  • Athletes were informed of their choices and risks and benefits associated to particular treatments prior to appointments. Consent was sought prior to interventions.
  • The provider had a clear vision and strategy and culture that put athletes care at the priority of its values.
  • Staff received training in a broad range of subjects related to the provision of care. However, infection prevention and control was not provided.

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

6 June 2013

During a routine inspection

One person who used the service told us they thought this was a well designed and "excellent" treatment centre.

Each person had a specific profile and treatment plan on their online records. There was detailed information about the presenting need of each athlete. The records included an initial presentation, imaging reports and referrals to consultants/specialists.

A staff member told us staff received appropriate professional development to maintain their knowledge and skills. Staff members told us they felt they were supported and well managed at all times and they were clear about their lines of accountability. We saw there were supervisory and peer support arrangements in place to monitor and review staff performances.

The manager told us incidents including any complaints were routinely monitored by senior staff to see if there were any trends. They said,' we explain to people how they can make a complaint but nothing has come up so far. We continually monitor our service to ensure we are always developing.'

25 June 2012

During a routine inspection

People told us they valued the service. All the people we spoke with told us they were happy with their decision to use the service. One person told us "I have always been treated with respect from people who know what they are doing. They help me perform well as an athlete".

Staff members we spoke with were positive about the role of the service and told us that people received a service within 48 hours of a request.

Staff members we spoke with confirmed they received regular training in Child Protection awareness in sports and active leisure. We were told that this training included some elements about the protection of vulnerable adults. There was no evidence that this was detailed enough to fully inform key staff members with the responsibility for safeguarding and adult protection. A senior staff member told us "we will ensure that we complete this training across all our services nationally".

We looked at the information about the availability of staff and saw there were sufficient staff to meet the needs of the people who used the service. One person told us 'I am very happy with the service I get. It's professional and trustworthy".