• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Rowan Court Nursing & Residential Home

Silverdale Road, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 2TA (01782) 622144

Provided and run by:
HC-One Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

11 July 2013

During a routine inspection

Rowan Court is registered to provide accommodation for up to 76 people. The home was divided into three units residential, dementia and nursing. Each unit had its own manager who reported to the registered manager. Our inspection took us into all three units of the home.

We saw that people were treated with respect by the staff that cared for them. One person said, "The staff are lovely, they are always polite'.

People who used the service received care appropriate to their personal needs. A person who used the service said, 'I think the care is excellent. I get everything I need, and I don't have to worry about remembering things the staff take care of everything for me'.

The nutritional needs of people who used the service were catered for. Systems were in place to monitor the weight and wellbeing of vulnerable people.

Staff told us they liked working at Rowan Court and believed they received the support they needed to provide people with the care they required. A member of staff said, 'We have lots of training and that gives you confidence that you are doing things right'.

The service had a complaints policy and information was available to advise people on how to raise concerns. We saw that complaints were recorded analysed and responded to.

24 September 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We inspected this service in June 2012, and we found the provider was not compliant with how medicines were managed and demonstrating how people had consented to their care. We carried out this inspection to check the improvements in these areas. The inspection was unannounced, which meant the provider and the staff did not know we were coming. We spoke with three people using the service, and three staff within the nursing unit about how care and treatment was delivered.

The provider had introduced a new electronic system of ordering and recording the medicines people received. People using the service told us it took longer to receive their medicines, but were confident that this would improve as staff became familiar with the new system. People we spoke with confirmed they were still receiving their prescribed medicines.

The staff had reviewed the care records with people using the service, to ensure that they agreed with important decisions that had been made about their care. Where people were not able to make a decision, staff had consulted family members and health professionals to help to make a decision in the person's best interest. We saw a copy of the decision making process which demonstrated how this decision had been reached. This meant people could be confident that they were being supported to make suitable decisions.

21 June 2012

During an inspection in response to concerns

We carried out this visit to check on the care and welfare of people using this service. The visit was unannounced which meant the provider and the staff did not know we were coming. We carried out this visit as part of our schedule of planned inspections.

Some people who used the service had special communication needs and used a combination of words and sounds to express themselves. Where people were not able to express their views to us we observed interaction between people and staff. We also used our Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI) tool to help us see what people's experiences were during the day. The SOFI tool allows us to spend time watching what is happening and helps us to record how people spend their time and whether they have positive experiences. This included looking at the support that was given to people using the service by the staff.

We saw that staff provided sensitive support and people were treated with respect. Personal care issues were discussed sensitively and discreetly. We spoke with eight people and four visitors who told us that they were happy with the care and support in the home and how the service was managed. They said, 'The staff are really good here and they let you know what's going on.' People said the staff were always available and responded promptly to any areas of concern. This meant people had confidence in the service.

People's privacy and dignity were respected. We saw staff knocking on people's doors and waiting for an answer before entering. People told us they could spend time alone in their bedroom when they wanted to.

We saw people were dressed in their own style and if they told us if they needed support, the staff would help them to continue to take a pride in their appearance. The manager spent time with people and ensured people were dressed appropriately, as part of their daily checks in the home.

People's diversity, values and human rights were respected. We saw that people's care records included information about their religious beliefs and their cultural needs.

Family and friends we spoke with told us they could visit the home whenever they wanted to. People using the service told us family members were able to continue to provide care for them and were involved in providing support. People said they went to their families' homes and continued to enjoy family events, and relatives could accompany them on medical appointments.

We heard that people and their relatives were asked for their views about the home. People told us they knew how to complain if they were unhappy but had not needed to do this.