• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

Herts & Essex Fertility Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Bishops' College, Churchgate, Cheshunt, Hertfordshire, EN8 9XP (01992) 785060

Provided and run by:
Herts & Essex Fertility Centre Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Herts & Essex Fertility Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Herts & Essex Fertility Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

23/11/2021

During a routine inspection

The service was last inspected in 2014 and met the standards required. This is the first time we have inspected this location under our new rating system. We rated it as good because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service-controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment, gave patients enough to eat and drink, and gave them pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information. Key services were available seven days a week.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients and families.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

However:

  • The safeguarding lead had only received safeguarding adult training to level 2. This was not in line with the intercollegiate document adult safeguarding: roles and competencies for health care staff guidance which states this person should be trained to level 3.

27 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with one person who used the service. They told us that the service always asked for their consent before any treatment was given. They said, "I have always signed paperwork to give my consent." They also said, "The service is amazing. There is always a friendly face and someone you know. It is lovely, I absolutely love it."

We looked at the treatment records of eight people who used the service. We saw that these contained detailed information on their medical and social history. This ensured that the service could properly assess the risk of any treatment to people's health and well-being.

On the day of our inspection the premises appeared to be bright, airy and spotlessly clean. We spoke with one person who told us, "Even if my boys play on the floor they still leave here clean." We saw that the service's infection control policy had been updated in January 2014.

The manager told us that they had put forward two members of the administration team, who had shown an interest in nursing, for an apprenticeship in health and social care. The staff had successfully completed the course and had become qualified health care assistants in December 2013.

We saw, that people's records were kept in locked cabinets within an area accessible only to people with the relevant security access. This meant that people's records were protected from access by unauthorised people.

6 March 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with told us that they were given good information and felt involved in decisions about their treatment. One person said, 'They explained everything well. We could ask questions and we were able to decide with them which would be the most successful option for us. I knew that they knew what they do best.'

People experienced care, treatment and support that met their needs and protected their rights. We saw that people's dignity and diversity were respected. One person said, 'That was well managed. We felt it was just about us. Every person is a new person here and they want to give each person all the success they can.'

The environment provided clean and well maintained surroundings for people using the service. People told us they found it comfortable and welcoming and that all the facilities and equipment needed were always to hand.

We found that people were cared for by suitably qualified, skilled and experienced staff. Records showed that there were safe recruitment processes in place and that staff were provided with the training required to support them in keeping people safe. People said, 'The staff are excellent", and, 'The staff are amazing. They work as a team and all know what they are doing.'