• Dentist
  • Dentist

Gentle Dental Care

2B Golders Green Road, London, NW11 8LH (020) 8455 9580

Provided and run by:
Mr Adam Jarvid

All Inspections

10 August 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of Gentle Dental Care on 10 August 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a focused announced inspection of Gentle Dental Care on 7 July 2022 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe, effective and well led care and was in breach of regulations 12, 17 and 18 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. We undertook immediate enforcement action and the provider`s CQC registration to carry on the regulated activities was suspended for a period of one month. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Gentle Dental Care dental practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Gentle Dental Care is in Golders Green, in the London Borough of Barnet and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

Metered parking spaces are available near the practice and it is also located close to public transport services.

The dental team includes a principal dentist and one qualified dental nurse.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist.

The practice is open:

Monday to Thursday 8.30am to 5pm

Fridays 8.30am to 1pm

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve the practice's processes for the control and storage of substances hazardous to health identified by the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, to ensure risk assessments are undertaken.

07 July 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focused inspection on 7 July 2022 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions, however due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • Improvements were needed to ensure that clinical staff kept up to date with current guidelines, and information related to patient care was suitably recorded within the dental care records.
  • The practice infection control procedures were not in accordance with published guidance.
  • The practice did not have effective arrangements for dealing with medical emergencies. Some of the life-saving medical emergency medicines and equipment were not available and staff were unclear about emergency procedures.
  • There were ineffective processes in place to prevent abuse of vulnerable adults and children.
  • Risks to staff and patients from undertaking of regulated activities had not been suitably identified and mitigated.
  • There were ineffective systems to ensure that staff were up to date with their training.
  • There was ineffective governance and leadership and a lack of continuous improvement.
  • There were ineffective systems to ensure facilities were safe and equipment was serviced and maintained according to manufacturers` guidance.
  • Improvements were needed to ensure that appropriate chairside support was provided by a dental nurse at all times.

Due to the nature of the concerns the provider was issued with a letter stating our intent to take urgent enforcement action. They were given an opportunity to submit (within one working day) an action plan as to how they intended to mitigate the risks identified by our inspection. The provider submitted an action plan, which included the urgent action they had taken and further improvements they had planned. As the improvements were not of a sufficient nature to mitigate the concerns, we undertook immediate enforcement action, and the provider’s CQC registration to undertake regulated activities is suspended for a period of one month.

Background

Gentle Dental Care is in Golders Green, in the London Borough of Barnet and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

Metered parking spaces are available near the practice and it is also located close to public transport services.

The dental team includes a principal dentist and one qualified dental nurse.

During the inspection we spoke with principal dentist and the dental nurse.

The practice is open:

Monday to Thursday 8.30am to 5pm

Fridays 8.30am to 1pm

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure persons employed in the provision of regulated activity receive the appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal necessary to enable them carry out their duties.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the College of General Dentistry (CGDent)
  • Improve staff awareness of sepsis.
  • Improve the practice protocols regarding auditing patient dental care records to check that necessary information is recorded.

26 September 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During our inspection on 6 August 2013 we found the dentist to be non-compliant and served a warning notice on 16 August 2013 with respect to infection control practices. At our follow-up inspection on 26 September 2013 we found that the dentist was compliant with the warning notice and people were protected from the risk of infection because appropriate guidance had been followed and action taken. People were cared for in a clean, hygienic environment.

For example, we found that most items of emergency medication and equipment recommended by the Resuscitation Council UK were in place. Policies and procedures were in place with regard to, for example, the decontamination of instruments and the cleaning of the practice. We observed that the decontamination process was compliant with requirements. The autoclave, which sterilized instruments, had been serviced and tests to provide the required validation certificate were booked.

Risk assessments had been undertaken and the dentist was firming up a plan to audit practices. The dentist had audited their decontamination processes using the tool recommended by the Department of Health's Health Technical Memorandum 01-05. This meant that people could be assured that the dentist was minimizing any risks they could face and continuously working to improve practices and the quality of service offered.

6 August 2013

During a routine inspection

Patients we spoke with were happy with the quality of the care they received. However, we found the dentist to be non-compliant. For example, there were no arrangements in place to deal with a patient collapse. The dentist had none of the recommended emergency equipment or medication.

Systems to reduce the risk and spread of infection were limited. The dentist was unaware of, and non-compliant with, the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05 (HTM 01-05), with which all dentists were expected to be compliant by December 2010. For example, the provider did not have an infection control policy and could not show us evidence of the dentist's or dental nurse's training in basic life support or infection control, other than hand hygiene. Evidence was provided of the dental nurse's Hepatitis B status two days after the inspection, but not of the dentist's. The provider could not show us their waste management contracts or invoices and we could not be sure how clinical waste was disposed of.

The dentist did not have systems in place to regularly assess and monitor the quality of services provided. Audits of practices were not undertaken. Practice-wide risks were not assessed. Patient surveys were not carried out. However, people we spoke with said they had no complaints or concerns about the quality of the service.