• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: C F Ng Dental Practice

802 High Road, Tottenham, London, N17 0DH (020) 8808 0501

Provided and run by:
Mr Cheong Ng

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

19 November 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of C F Ng Dental Practice on 19 November 2021. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of C F Ng Dental Practice on 10 August 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe or well led care and was in breach of regulations 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for C F Ng Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 10 August 2021.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 10 August 2021.

Background

C F Ng Dental Practice is in Tottenham, in the London borough of Haringey and provides NHS general dental treatment to adults and children.

The practice is located on the first floor of a four-storey building close to White Hart Lane over ground train station. There is no level access into the building for people who use wheelchairs or those with pushchairs. The practice has one treatment room which has a designated decontamination area.

The team includes the principal dentist and two dental nurses.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist and both of the dental nurses. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open to patients:

Monday to Friday from 9.30am to 12.30pm and 2pm to 5pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice had systems in place to help them assess and manage risk. These were consistent and in line with current best practice.
  • Risk assessments had been undertaken to minimise risks to patients and staff.
  • The provider had effective governance systems to monitor the day to day running of the practice.
  • Quality assurance processes had been implemented to encourage learning and continuous improvement, such as an ongoing audit cycle of infection control, radiography and record keeping.

10 August 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced inspection on 10 August 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions. However, due to the ongoing pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These are three of the five questions that form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

C F Ng Dental Practice is in Tottenham, in the London borough of Haringey and provides NHS general dental treatment to adults and children.

The practice is located on the first floor of a four-storey building close to White Hart Lane over ground train station. There is no level access into the building for people who use wheelchairs or those with pushchairs. The practice has one treatment room which has a designated decontamination area.

The team includes the principal dentist and two dental nurses.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist and both of the dental nurses. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open to patients:

Monday to Friday from 9.30am to 12.30pm and 2pm to 5pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The provider had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team. Staff spoke openly about how much they enjoyed working at the practice.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance; there was no system in place for the quality assurance of these procedures.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available; however, they were not regularly checked to ensure that they were in date and in good condition. The defibrillator pads were past their use by date.
  • The practice had some systems to help them assess and manage risk. However, these were not always consistent or in line with current guidance and legislation.
  • Risk assessments had not been undertaken to minimise the risk that can be caused from substances that are hazardous to health.
  • The provider did not have effective governance systems to monitor the day to day running of the practice.
  • There was lack of a quality assurance process to encourage learning and continuous improvement, such as an ongoing audit cycle of infection control, radiography and record keeping.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Furthermore, there were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement an effective system for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports issued by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, the Central Alerting System and other relevant bodies, such as Public Health England.
  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.
  • Improve the security of NHS prescription pads in the practice and ensure there are systems in place to track and monitor their use.
  • Implement a system to ensure patient referrals to other dental or health care professionals are centrally monitored to ensure they are received in a timely manner and not lost.

Full details of the regulations the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

15 October 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Last time we inspected this practice in February 2013 we found it was not meeting all the relevant regulations. This time we saw that the staff team had worked very hard to ensure that the practice was fully compliant with the regulations. Only one room was being used for consultations and this benefited from new flooring and storage, as well as new equipment, including the dental chair. Plans were in place to make further improvements which had been recommended by NHS England.

Policies and procedures had been developed and there was evidence of regular checks being carried out on equipment. Service contracts were in place to ensure equipment was well maintained. A dental nurse demonstrated the correct procedures for decontaminating instruments.

We saw certificates which confirmed that staff had recently undertaken appropriate training, for example in basic life support, and we checked that the practice had the recommended emergency medicines on site so they could assist anyone who became seriously unwell on the premises.

We spoke to two people who used the service over the telephone. They were very complimentary about the service they had received over many years. One person said, 'I couldn't fault them at all.'

20 February 2013

During a routine inspection

Patients told us that they were happy with the service provided.

We found a practice that failed to provide evidence that it was following national guidance. There was no coherent system of governance in place. Specific areas of concern were the lack of infection control policies and audits, and the safe operation of diagnostic and decontamination equipment which contributed to concerns regarding patient's ongoing safety and welfare.

Patients may be at risk because there were inadequate procedures to protect patients in the event of a medical emergency as emergency equipment was not readily available and fit for use.