• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Mr Roopesh Singh

10 The Crescent, Spalding, Lincolnshire, PE11 1AE (01775) 760364

Provided and run by:
Mr Roopesh Singh

All Inspections

8 July 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Recent Regulatory History

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Mr Roopesh Singh, also known as Crescent Dental surgery on 11 November 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe or well led care and was in breach of regulation 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

We carried out a follow up inspection of Mr Roopesh Singh on 4 March 2022 and found the provider was again not providing well led care and was in breach of Regulation 17. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Mr Roopesh Singh, dental practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

We undertook a further follow up focused inspection of Mr Roopesh Singh, also known as Crescent Dental surgery on 8 July 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

When one or more of the key questions (listed below) are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Key questions:

  • Is it safe?
  • Is it effective?
  • Is it well-led?
  • Is it caring?
  • Is it responsive?

This is the report of our findings from the follow up inspection on 8 July 2022 where our focus was on the following 3 key questions.

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded fully to all of the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 4 March 2022.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was not providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded to the all of the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 4 March 2022.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded fully to all of the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 4 March 2022.

Background

The practice is not accessible to people with reduced mobility as access is via a set of stone steps. The practice is located on a narrow road so parking is not available although there are several car parks a short walk away.

The dental team includes one dentist, one dental nurse and a practice manager. The practice has one treatment room and a dedicated decontamination room.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentist, the dental nurse, and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday, Tuesday and Friday from 9.15am to 5.30pm

Thursday from 9.15am to 1pm

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way for service users.

Ensure systems and processes that enable the registered person to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the services being provided are in place.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

4 March 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of Mr Roopesh Singh on 4 March 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Mr Roopesh Singh on 11 November 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe, effective or well-led care and was in breach of regulations 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Mr Roopesh Singh dental practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the three questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded to all of the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 11 November 2021.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was not providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded to all of the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 11 November 2021

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded to all of the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 11 November 2021

Background

Mr Roopesh Singh, known as Crescent Dental Surgery, is in Spalding, Lincolnshire and provides private dental treatment for adults and children.

The practice is not accessible to people with reduced mobility as access is via a set of stone steps. The practice is located on a narrow road so parking is not available although there are several car parks a short walk away.

The dental team includes one dentist, one dental nurse and a practice manager. The practice has one treatment room and a dedicated decontamination room.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentist, the dental nurse, and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday, Tuesday and Friday from 9.15am to 5.30pm

Thursday from 9.15am to 1pm

Our key findings were:

  • The provider had not made sufficient progress to ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

  • The provider had not made sufficient progress to improve the practice’s arrangements for ensuring good governance and leadership are sustained in the longer term.

  • A system of checks of medical emergency equipment and medicines taking into account the guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the General Dental Council had been implemented but it was not effective.

  • The provider had taken robust and effective action to implement recommendations in the practice's fire safety risk assessment and ensure ongoing fire safety for all people at the practice.

  • Practice protocols and procedures to ensure staff are up to date with their mandatory training and their continuing professional development, were improved but still not effective.

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

  • Improve the practice’s arrangements for ensuring good governance and leadership are sustained in the longer term.

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

Full details of the regulation/s the provider was/is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement practice protocols and procedures to ensure staff are up to date with their mandatory training and their continuing professional development.

11 November 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced inspection on 11 November 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice not providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Roopesh Singh (known as Crescent Dental Practice) is in Spalding, Lincolnshire and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

The practice is not accessible to people with reduced mobility as access is via a set of stone steps. The practice is located on a narrow road so parking is not available although there are several car parks a short walk away.

The dental team includes one dentist, one trainee dental nurse and a practice manager. The practice has one treatment room and a dedicated decontamination room.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentist, the trainee dental nurse and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday, Tuesday and Friday 9.15am to 5.30pm

Thursday 9.15am to 1pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean.
  • The provider had infection control procedures, although we found these were not applied effectively or consistently.
  • Life-saving equipment was missing from the medical emergency kit and we could not confirm if staff had completed relevant training.
  • Systems were not operated effectively to help manage risk to patients and staff.
  • Staff had not completed relevant safeguarding training.
  • Staff recruitment procedures did not reflect current legislation.
  • Patients’ care and treatment was not always provided in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Preventive care and advice to support patients to maintain better oral health was not given consistently or recorded in patient records.
  • Leadership was not effective and did not promote or enable continuous improvement.
  • Processes were not in place to enable staff or patients to give feedback about the service.
  • The provider’s information governance arrangements did not reflect current guidance.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

  • Improve the practice’s arrangements for ensuring good governance and leadership are sustained in the longer term.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement practice protocols and procedures to ensure staff are up to date with their mandatory training and their continuing professional development.

  • Take action to ensure dentists are aware of the guidelines issued by the British Endodontic Society for the use of rubber dam for root canal treatment .

  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the College of General Dentistry.

13, 19 August 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We spoke with one patient who told us that dentist, dental nurse were all very good, they always treated her with kindness, everything was explained to her and she was very happy with the service.

The provider had made suitable arrangements to ensure that staff had received clear guidance about the safeguarding of vulnerable adults and children. This meant that people who use the service were protected from the risk of potential abuse.

The provider had made arrangements to implement current infection prevention and control guidance in regards to decontamination room within the practice. This showed us that people who used the service were fully protected from the risk of cross infection.

There was a current audit framework in place and actions arising from previous audits had been fully addressed. This demonstrated to us that the provider did have an effective system to assess and monitor the quality of service that people received.

27 January 2014

During a routine inspection

The provider's practice information leaflet was unavailable for people who used the service. This meant that people who used the service did not have clear and current information about the practice and the dental treatments provided.

Those dental treatment records seen were incomplete and lacked clear information about current medical history and the treatment given during each consultation. This showed us that people did not always experience care, treatment and support that met their needs and protected their rights.

The provider had not made suitable arrangements to ensure that staff had received clear guidance about the safeguarding of vulnerable adults and children. This meant that people who use the service were not protected from the risk of potential abuse.

The provider had not made arrangements to implement current infection prevention and control guidance. This showed us that people who used the service were not fully protected from the risk of cross infection.

There was no current audit framework in place and actions arising from previous audits had not been fully addressed. This demonstrated to us that the provider did not have an effective system to assess and monitor the quality of service that people received.