• Dentist
  • Dentist

Dr Baber Khan - The Crescent

9 The Crescent, Spalding, Lincolnshire, PE11 1AE (01775) 723051

Provided and run by:
Dr. Baber Khan

All Inspections

23 November 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of Crescent Dental Practice on 23 November 2023. This inspection was carried out to review the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

We carried out this announced focussed inspection under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental advisor.

  • We had previously undertaken a comprehensive inspection of Crescent Dental Practice on 13 September 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions.

  • We found the registered provider was not providing safe or well-led care and was in breach of regulations 9, 12, 13 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

  • We conducted further follow up focused inspections on 2 September 2021 and December 2022 where we found continued breaches of regulations 12 and 17.

You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Crescent Dental Practice dental practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When 1 or more of the 5 questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection, we asked:

  • Is it safe?
  • Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded to the continued regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 15 December 2022.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded to the continued regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 15 December 2022.

Background

Crescent Dental Practice, is in the Lincolnshire market town of Spalding and provides private treatment for adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs at the rear of the premises. There are no car parking facilities, but there are public car parks within close proximity to the practice. These include parking for blue badge holders.

The dental team includes 3 dentists, 2 dental nurses and 1 receptionist. The practice has 2 treatment rooms and a dedicated decontamination room.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

The provider was not present during the inspection. We spoke with 1 dental nurse, 1 receptionist and a staff member identified as a practice manager / receptionist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open Monday to Friday from 9am to 5pm.

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

15 December 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a focused inspection of Dr Baber Khan - The Crescent on 15 December 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Dr Baber Khan - The Crescent on 02 September 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well led care and was in breach of regulation 17of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Dr Baber Khan - The Crescent dental practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls we found at our inspection on 21 September 2021

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 21 September 2021.

Background

Dr Baber Khan - The Crescent, is in the Lincolnshire market town of Spalding and provides private treatment for adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs at the rear of the premises. There are no car parking facilities, but there are public car parks within close proximity to the practice. These include parking for blue badge holders.

The dental team includes 1 dentist, 2 dental nurses, 1 dental hygienist and a receptionist. The practice has two treatment rooms and a dedicated decontamination room.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentist and both dental nurses. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday to Friday from 9am to 5pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The provider had implemented systems to reduce the risk and spread of legionella and remedial action to reduce risk of harm was completed by a competent person.

  • The provider had not ensured that the electrical fixed wiring was safe, and had not completed remedial action to reduce risk of harm.

  • Multiple items available for use in the medical emergency kit that were out of date.

  • There were limited systems for monitoring and improving quality. For example, regular audits of radiography, infection prevention and control and disability access were not completed.

  • There was limited oversight of staff training needs and completion of training.

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulations the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement an effective system for monitoring and recording the fridge temperature to ensure that medicines and dental care products are stored in line with the manufacturer’s guidance.

  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the College of General Dentistry.

  • Implement practice protocols regarding auditing patient dental care records to check that necessary information is recorded.

02 09 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a focused inspection of Dr Baber Khan - The Crescent on 2 September 2021. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector.

We undertook an inspection of Dr Baber Khan on 13 September 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe, effective and well-led care and was in breach of regulations 9, 12, 13, 17 and 19 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Dr Baber Khan - The Crescent on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 13 September 2019.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 13 September 2019.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 13 September 2019.

Background

Dr Baber Khan - The Crescent, is in the Lincolnshire market town of Spalding and provides private treatment for adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs at the rear of the premises. There are no car parking facilities, but there are public car parks within close proximity to the practice. These include parking for blue badge holders.

The dental team includes one dentist, two dental nurses and one dental hygienist. The practice has two treatment rooms and a dedicated decontamination room.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist, two dental nurses and one dental hygienist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday to Friday from 9am to 5pm.

Our key findings were:

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

  • Take action to implement any recommendations in the practice's Legionella risk assessment, taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance.’ In particular, carry out regular monitoring checks of water temperature and flushing of seldom used outlets.

  • Take action to ensure the suitability of the premises and ensure all areas are fit for the purpose for which they are being used. In particular, ensure a satisfactory electrical fixed wiring safety certificate is obtained.

Full details of the regulations the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement an effective system for identifying, disposing and replenishing of out-of-date stock.

  • Take action to ensure audits, specifically those of antimicrobial prescribing, radiography and infection prevention and control are undertaken at regular intervals to improve the quality of the service. Practice should also ensure that, where appropriate, audits have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.

13 September 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 13 September 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was not providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

The practice is in Spalding, a market town in the South Holland district of Lincolnshire. It provides private dental treatment to adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs at the rear of the premises. There are no car parking facilities, but on road parking is available for a limited time. There are also public car parks within close proximity to the practice. These include parking for blue badge holders.

The dental team includes one dentist, one dental hygienist and a practice manager. The practice manager had recently qualified as a dental nurse. A the time of our inspection, the provider was in the process of recruiting a dental nurse, as one working in the practice had recently left.

The practice has two treatment rooms, one on ground floor level and a separate decontamination room.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

We sent 50 comment cards in advance of our visit to the practice for patients to complete. On the day of inspection, we collected 7 CQC comment cards that had been filled in by patients. This represented a 14% response rate.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentist, dental hygienist, and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday from 9am to 5pm. It is closed on Wednesdays.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance. We noted some improvements could be made when manual cleaning of dental instruments took place.
  • All but one member of staff had received formal training in how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines were available, but not all life-saving equipment.
  • The provider had insufficient systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider did not have adequate safeguarding processes and not all staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider did not have a recruitment policy or procedure. We noted areas where legislative requirements were not met such as obtaining of references or other evidence of previous satisfactory conduct in employment for staff.
  • We were not assured that clinical staff always provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • Staff were aware of the importance of patient confidentiality.
  • The provider used a comment box to obtain feedback from patients.
  • The provider had not received any formal complaints.
  • The provider did not demonstrate effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff changes had impacted upon the smooth running of the service.
  • The provider demonstrated they were taking responsive action after the day of our visit.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure the care and treatment of patients is appropriate, meets their needs and reflects their preferences.
  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Ensure patients are protected from abuse and improper treatment
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure dentists are aware of the guidelines issued by the British Endodontic Society for the use of dental dams for root canal treatment.
  • Take action to ensure the clinicians take into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health publication ‘Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention’ when promoting the maintenance of good oral health.
  • Introduce protocols regarding the prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.
  • Implement processes and systems for seeking and learning from patient feedback with a view to monitoring and improving the quality of the service.
  • Take action to ensure the service takes into account the needs of patients with disabilities and to comply with the requirements of the Equality Act 2010.

14 March 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We inspected the service in November 2013 we found the provider did not have systems in place to reduce the risk of infection or to monitor the quality of the service people received. We visited on 14 March 2014 to check what improvements the provider had made. We spoke with the provider and the three members of staff who worked at the practice.

We found the practice environment was generally clean and tidy. The provider and the dental nurse were wearing short sleeved tunics which appeared clean.

The provider had identified the dental nurse as the designated lead for infection prevention and control. The dental nurse demonstrated a clear knowledge and understanding of the systems and arrangements in place.

We saw policies had been updated and reflected the latest guidance and audits had been competed to identify areas for improvement.

Records showed contracts were in place to ensure equipment was serviced and met required standards. Environmental risk assessments were in place to ensure people and staff were protected from risks relating to disposing of waste, radiation and fire.

18, 21 October and 8 November 2013

During an inspection in response to concerns

We visited the service on 18 October 2013 as we had received some information of concerns about the provider. The dental nurse who was the designated infection control lead was not available on 18 October 2013 so we went back to the service on 21 October 2013 to speak with them. We also visited on 8 November 2013 to check compliance with outstanding compliance actions. A specialist advisor who was a dentist visited with us on 18 October 2013 and 8 November 2013.

When we visited on 8 November 2013 the provider informed us all the permanent staff had left their employment and they were working with temporary staff to provide a service to people.

We saw people received the care they needed. They were involved in discussions about their care and were given time to make decisions. One person told us, 'You can think about it and the cost.'

Systems for ensuring people were protected from the risk of infection were not always followed correctly. Infection control audits were not completed accurately.

Staff were supported to access training and receive appraisals.

The provider did not have robust arrangements in place to monitor the quality of the service people received. They did not respond to advice from professionals and did not complete appropriate audits to identify areas for improvement.

18 March 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Dr Baber Khan ' The Crescent currently has one dentist. The patients are all private. We visited to check if they were compliant with a warning notice we issued following our visit in 22 January 2013. We spoke with two members of staff and the dentist.

When we visited on 22 January 2013 we saw decontamination processes were not always effective in reducing the risk of infection. We also identified the cleaning schedule did not support identified infection control standards.

When we visited on 18 March 2013 we saw there was a good improvement in the cleanliness of the clinical and non clinical areas. Cleaning processes were in place and records showed daily cleaning was happening.

The decontamination process had been reviewed. A disinfecting cleaning solution was used to scrub dirty instruments and all instruments were visually inspected. Records showed the autoclave was tested and working correctly each day. However, we saw there was no hand washing facilities in the decontamination room.

22 January 2013

During a routine inspection

Dr Baber Khan ' The Crescent currently has one dentist. The patients are all private. We spoke with two members of staff, one dentist and a patient who was visiting the service at the time of our visit.

The patient told us the dentist discussed their treatment options. They said, "I always get a treatment plan and have a good idea of what's happening.'

The patient told us the dentists and dental nurses wore protective equipment, for example gloves, to reduce the risk of infection. However we saw decontamination processes were not always effective in reducing the risk of infection. We also identified the cleaning schedule did not support identified infection control standards.

We saw the emergency medication was not all within their expiry dates. We also saw some of the recommended medication was not available.

Members of staff told us they had not received any training in the last 15 months. They also said they did not have yearly appraisals or regular supervision to support them and indentify training needs.

We saw risks to people were not always identified or managed. Routine audits to monitor the quality of the service provided did not happen.