• Dentist
  • Dentist

Deu Dental Headingley

10 Otley Road, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS6 2AD (0113) 278 4000

Provided and run by:
Dr. Jagtar Deu

All Inspections

17 November 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focussed inspection 17 November 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we asked the following three questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Deu Dental Headingley is in the Headingley area of the city of Leeds and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

The dental team includes three dentists, one dental hygiene therapist, three dental nurses including one trainee dental nurse, one receptionist and a practice manager. The practice has three treatment rooms, one of which is located on the ground floor.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with dentists, dental nurses and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday to Friday: 9am to 5:30pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance. However, improvements should be made to the recording of validation tests on the equipment used within those procedures.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Improvements should be made to the monitoring of referrals made to other dental practitioners.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve the practice’s infection control procedures and protocols taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance’. In particular tests on the washer disinfector and autoclave and recording of the results.

  • Improve the system to ensure patient referrals to other dental or health care professionals are centrally monitored to ensure they are received in a timely manner and not lost.

  • Take action to ensure audits of antimicrobial prescribing are undertaken at regular intervals to improve the quality and safety of the service. The practice should also ensure that, where appropriate, audits have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated. Improvements should be made to the system for auditing infection prevention and control to ensure areas for improvement are identified and actioned.

16 June 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 16 June 2016 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Deu Dental Headingley is situated in the Headingly area of Leeds, West Yorkshire. It offers mainly NHS treatment to patients of all ages but also offers private dental treatments. The services include preventative advice and treatment and routine restorative dental care.

The practice has three surgeries, a decontamination room, an X-ray room, two waiting areas and a reception area. The reception area, one waiting area, the X-ray room and one surgery are on the ground floor. The other two surgeries and the second smaller waiting area are on the first floor. There are accessible toilet facilities on the ground floor of the premises.

There are three dentists (one of which is a foundation dentist), two dental hygienists, six dental nurses (three of which are trainees), two receptionists and a practice manager. 

The opening hours are Monday to Friday from 9-00am to 5-30pm.

The practice owner is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) as an individual. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with three patients who used the service and reviewed 74 completed CQC comment cards. The patients were all positive about the care and treatment they received at the practice. Comments included that the premises were hygienic and safe, they were made to feel relaxed and comfortable and that staff were polite, friendly and helpful. Patients also commented that treatment was well explained and they were given good advice with respect to dental hygiene.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice had systems in place to assess and manage risks to patients and staff including infection prevention, control and health and safety and the management of medical emergencies.
  • Staff were qualified and had received training appropriate to their roles.
  • Dental care records were detailed and showed that treatment was planned in line with current best practice guidelines.
  • Oral health advice and treatment were provided in-line with the ‘Delivering Better Oral Health’ toolkit (DBOH).
  • We observed that patients were treated with kindness and respect by staff. Staff ensured there was sufficient time to explain fully the care and treatment they were providing in a way patients understood.
  • Patients were involved in making decisions about their treatment and were given clear explanations about their proposed treatment including costs, benefits and risks.
  • Patients were able to make routine and emergency appointments when needed.
  • Staff from the practice participated in smile month and made visits to local schools to provide oral hygiene advice
  • The practice had an effective complaints system in place and there was an openness and transparency in how these were dealt with.
  • The practice had effective governance arrangements in place and regularly audited clinical and non-clinical areas relating to the dental practice

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the practice’s arrangements the storage of local anaesthetics.

12 July 2012

During a routine inspection

All five people we spoke with told us they were very satisfied with the care and treatment they received.

People said they were fully involved in decisions about their treatments and the dentist was very good at explaining the treatment they received. People told us the dentists gave them information about the treatment options and the costs were explained. They told us they felt comfortable to ask questions about the treatments available if they wished to do so. All five people we spoke with told us that their privacy, confidentiality and dignity was always maintained and respected.

All the people we spoke with told us that they made routine and follow up appointments before they left the dentist. They also told us that they very rarely had to wait to see the dentist. However, if the dentist was running a little behind each person told us they were kept informed about the delays.

People who told us they were happy with the care they received and no concerns were expressed about the treatment provided at the practice. People told us if they had any concerns or complaints they would discuss them with members of staff, the provider or the dentist.

The five people we spoke with told us that the practice was always clean, tidy and they had no concerns with the hygiene.