• Dentist
  • Dentist

Findon Dental Care

181 Findon Road, Findon, Worthing, West Sussex, BN14 0EP (01903) 872122

Provided and run by:
Dr. Fariba Shameli

All Inspections

13 October 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focused inspection on 13 October 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following

three questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Findon Dental Care is in Findon, Worthing and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes three dentists, three dental nurses, one of which is the practice manager and two dental hygienists. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with two dental nurses and the practice manager who is also a registered dental nurse. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

  • Monday to Friday 9am to 5pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff. However, improvements should be made to the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health file.
  • Improvements could be made to patient care notes to improve recorded content in relation to local anaesthetic details, tooth decay, baseline charting or X-ray justification.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.

The provider had information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve the practice's processes for the control and storage of substances hazardous to health identified by the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, to ensure risk assessments are undertaken for all products and medicines held at the practice.

  • Take action to ensure the clinicians take into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice when completing dental care records.

  • Take action to ensure that all clinical staff have adequate immunity for vaccine preventable infectious diseases

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

We inspected the service on 7 November 2012 and found that although staff understood the importance of safeguarding vulnerable people, staff did not have appropriate training or policies in place for the safeguarding of vulnerable adults. We did a desk based review on 25 April 2013 to determine if this training had been implemented.

We found that all staff had received training in safeguarding adults and children and this was evidenced by training certificates submitted by the provider.

7 November 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Three patients of the practice were willing to speak with us in the waiting area of the practice. The people we spoke with said they had been patients of the practice for many years and their family members also used the practice. People told us they were happy with the care and treatment they had received. People said that options were discussed with them and proper consent had been obtained. People said the premises was clean and hygienic.

We found that people's treatment had been planned and implemented according to people's needs. People's consent was given before treatment was provided.

We found the provider had implemented more robust recruiting and vetting procedures. Staff had a curriculum vitae (CV) and Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks. Appropriate staffing checks ensured the suitability and character of staff members.

We found that the premises was clean and tidy. The provider had systems in place to check and maintain the sterilisation equipment. Multi-use instruments were cleaned according to best practice guidance and staff understood how to clean and disinfect the surgery and its equipment. Because of this, people and staff were protected against the risk of infection.

We found that although staff understood the importance of safeguarding vulnerable people, staff did not have appropriate training or policies in place for the safeguarding of vulnerable adults.

14 March 2012

During a routine inspection

People commented positively about the treatment and service they received from this provider.

People told us that they were treated with respect and that they had been given information to make informed choices about their treatment.