• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Mr Muhammad Darr - Upper Wickham Lane

184 Upper Wickham Lane, Welling, Kent, DA16 3EB (020) 8854 0573

Provided and run by:
Mr. Muhammad Darr

All Inspections

25 May 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 25 May 2017 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Mr Muhammad Darr – Upper Wickham Lane is in Welling, in the London Borough of Bexley. It provides NHS and private treatment to patients of all ages.

There is no level access for people who use wheelchairs and pushchairs, though the practice has a stair lift. Car parking spaces, including those for patients with disabled badges, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes six dentists, a receptionist, five dental nurses (one of whom also works as a receptionist), two trainee dental nurses, two dental hygienists, and a practice co-ordinator who also works as a receptionist.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection we collected 31 CQC comment cards filled in by patients. This information gave us a positive view of the practice.

During the inspection we spoke with a dentist, two dental nurses, and two receptionists. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open Monday to Thursday from 8.30am to 12.30pm and 2pm to 5pm, and on Fridays from 8.30am to 1pm and 2pm to 4.30pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was clean and well maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership. Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • Staff had completed a range of key training, though improvements could be made to ensure all staff received fire safety training.
  • Electronic dental care records were well-written, though improvements could be made to the detail of information written on paper dental care records.

There are areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the training needs of staff members to ensure they receive fire safety training.

  • Review the practice's protocols for completion of dental care records taking into account guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice regarding clinical examinations and record keeping.

  • Review the current staffing arrangements to ensure all dental care professionals are adequately supported by a trained member of the dental team when treating patients in a dental setting taking into account the guidance issued by the General Dental Council.

  • Review the staff supervision protocols and ensure an effective process is established for the on-going appraisal of all staff

8 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke to some people who had received treatment on the day of our inspection and each person told us they were happy with the treatment they received. For example, one person told us "I am happy coming here. I would give the dentist 10 out of 10". People told us they had been given information from the dentist about the treatments options available and they had been able to make an informed decision. They said they were always clear about the costs involved with their treatments and we heard people could have private work carried out if they chose to. People told us the staff were welcoming and polite and they felt the surgery and treatment areas were always clean and that staff wore appropriate protective clothing during treatments.

We found people were provided with information about different treatment options to enable them to choose a treatment suitable to their needs and people's preferences were respected. We found people received treatment after an examination of their needs and their medical history was checked to ensure they received treatment safely. The surgery and treatments areas were sufficiently cleaned and the instrument decontamination process took place in a way that prevented the risk of cross contamination. Staff were sufficiently supported through induction, training and team meetings and the provider maintained appropriate records and stored them securely.