• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Archived: The Medical @ Temple Quay

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 3, The Square, Temple Quay, Bristol, BS1 6DG (0117) 376 3732

Provided and run by:
Total Health Ethos Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

15 Jan 2020

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Medical @ Temple Quay on 15 January 2020 as part of our inspection programme and to follow up on breaches of regulations.

CQC inspected the service on 21 May 2019 and told the provider to make improvements regarding Regulation 17- Good governance. We also identified areas where the provider should make improvements which were:

  • Conduct patient surveys to assess patient needs.
  • Improve systems for the identification of significant events to support learning.
  • To update the website relating to patient eligibility as soon as possible.

We checked these areas as part of this comprehensive inspection and found these had been resolved.

The Medical @ Temple Quay is a private doctor’s consultation and treatment service.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some general exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Services at The Medical @ Temple Quay (The Medical) are provided to patients under arrangements made by their employer/ a government department/an insurance provider with whom the servicer user holds an insurance policy (other than a standard health insurance policy. These types of arrangements are exempt by law from CQC regulation. Therefore, we were only able to inspect the services which are not arranged for patients by their employers/ a government department/an insurance provider with whom the patient holds a policy (other than a standard health insurance policy).

One of the GPs working for the provider was the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

As part of our inspection we asked for Care Quality Commission comment cards to be completed by patients prior to our inspection. We received feedback about the service from 35 patients. All the respondents commented positively about their experiences, stating they received a high level of service and were treated with care and consideration.

Our key findings were:

  • The service had made improvement to their processes to ensure risks to patients were monitored.
  • Systems and processes had been improved to ensure oversight of safety alerts.
  • There was a programme of quality improvement to monitor prescribing practices.
  • Improvements had been made to the process for communicating with other services regarding patient care and safety. However, we found that this needed further improvement.
  • Systems for obtaining and recording of consent had improved and embedded.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The service organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • There were systems in place to signpost patients to other appropriate services if the service could not meet their needs.

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way.

(Please see the specific details on action required at the end of this report).

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to embed quality improvement activities to monitor prescribing especially those relating to medicines which could potentially be misused and appropriate treatment with antibiotics.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

21/05/2019

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Requires Improvement overall. (Previous inspection December 2017)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Requires Improvement

Are services effective? – Requires Improvement

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Inadequate

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Medical @ Temple as part of our inspection programme

The Medical @ Temple Quay is a private doctor’s consultation and treatment service.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Services at The Medical @ Temple Quay (The Medical) are provided to patients under arrangements made by their employer/ a government department. These types of arrangements are exempt by law from CQC regulation. Therefore we were only able to inspect the services which are within the regulatory parameters for which the provider is regulated.

One of the GPs working for the provider was the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

As part of our inspection we asked for Care Quality Commission comment cards to be completed by patients prior to our inspection. We received feedback about the service from 38 patients. All the respondents commented positively about their experiences, stating they received a high level of service and were treated with care and consideration.

Our key findings were:

  • Policies and processes were not always embedded in practice.
  • Oversight of staff training was not properly maintained.
  • Quality improvement activity was not comprehensive.
  • Risks to patients safety was not always appropriately monitored.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect.
  • Services met patients’ needs.

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Conduct patient surveys to assess patient needs.
  • Should update their website relating to patient eligibility as soon as possible.
  • Ensure there is a system in place to retain medical records in line with Department of Health and Social Care guidance.

(Please see the specific details on action required at the end of this report).


Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

4 December 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 4 December 2017 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

We visited The Medical @ Temple Quay which is a private doctor’s consultation service and doctor’s treatment service. The service is aimed at people who are working and who cannot get an appointment at their registered GP which suits their working pattern. All consultations are face to face between patients and clinicians.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. At The Medical @ Temple Quay (The Medical) services are provided to patients under arrangements made by their employer/ a government department/an insurance company with whom the servicer user holds a policy (other than a standard health insurance policy). These types of arrangements are exempt by law from CQC regulation. Therefore, at The Medical, we were only able to inspect the services which are within the regulatory parameters for which the provider is regulated.

Dr Geoffrey Hogg is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

There was limited feedback from the single comment card completed however, the service has feedback forms available and patients can comment online.

Our key findings were:

  • There was a transparent approach to safety with demonstrably effective systems in place for reporting and recording incidents.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • All consultation rooms were well organised and equipped, with good light and ventilation.
  • There were systems in place to check all equipment had been serviced regularly.
  • Clinicians regularly assessed patients according to appropriate guidance and standards such as those issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
  • The staff team maintained the necessary skills and competence to support the needs of patients.
  • The staff team were up to date with current guidelines and were led by a proactive management team.
  • Risks to patients were well managed for example, there were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection.
  • The provider was aware of, and complied with, the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review that recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to be able to demonstrate only fit and proper persons are employed.
  • Review the electronic record system for medicines so that expiry dates are flagged.