• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: CCC Dover Drive

18-20 Dover Drive, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, CH65 5BP (0151) 355 1157

Provided and run by:
Cheshire West and Chester Council

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

12 November 2013

During a routine inspection

The home offers a respite service where people usually go for short stays only. At the time of the visit there were only two people using the service.

We spoke with the relative of one of the people, who told us that the support the service would provide was agreed with them before the first admission. They said that one of the senior staff from the home always rang before each admission to check whether there had been any changes in the person's needs. The relative said they were happy with the care provided; "There were teething problems at first, but now I have hardly any concerns, they're really good."

We observed staff interaction with the other person and looked at their care file. We saw that the care was person-centred and inclusive.

People using the service could choose from a varied menu and their nutritional needs were met.

The home was clean and well maintained.

Staff received appropriate training and said they felt well supported by managers. The relative we spoke with said they thought that the majority of staff were well trained to do their jobs.

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

At our previous inspection in November 2012 we found that the provider did not have appropriate arrangements in place for the safekeeping of medication.

Following that inspection, the registered manager confirmed that the provider had purchased and fitted new medicine cabinets in each bedroom and that only the staff responsible for administering medicines had access to the keys for those cabinets.

28 November 2012

During a routine inspection

At the time of the visit there were only two people using the service. We spoke with the relative of one of the people, who told us that the support the service intended to provide was agreed with the person who would be using the service and their family before their first admission. They said that one of the senior staff from the home always rang before each admission to check whether there had been any changes in the person's needs. The relative said they were always made to feel welcome, they were happy with the care provided and that staff were "lovely". They also said they knew how to raise any concerns.

Staff confirmed that 'best interests' meetings were held if any decisions needed to be made for people who did not have capacity to make the decision.

We found that medicines were administered and recorded correctly, but they were not stored safely because too many people had access to the cabinets where medicines were kept.

28 December 2011

During a routine inspection

We were not able to obtain the views of the people residing in the service at the time of the inspection visit but we spoke with a relative of a person who was receiving respite care.

The relative told us that the registered manager visited the person at home to discuss with them and the family what their needs were before admission. Before they made a decision to stay in the home they were invited for tea on a few occasions.

The relative said they were always made to feel welcome at Dover Drive and were very happy with the care provided because people staying in the service were treated respectfully, as individuals with their own needs and wishes.

They said they were happy with and confident in all the staff working there and that that their relative's needs were able to be met by the number of staff provided. The relative also commented that staff consistency helped because all the staff knew and understood people's needs and preferences.

The relative said that staff listened to them and that any changes in the person's needs were discussed and changes to the care plan were agreed before being implemented.

They said that they knew how to raise any concerns and had confidence that the registered manager would address them. They also confirmed that they were asked about the quality of the service after each visit.