You are here

All reports

Inspection report

Date of Inspection: 23 July 2014
Date of Publication: 13 August 2014
Inspection Report published 13 August 2014 PDF

Overview

Inspection carried out on 23 July 2014

During a routine inspection

What people told us and what we found

Our inspection team was made up of an inspector and an expert by experience. An expert by experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service. During the inspection the team gathered evidence to help answer our five key questions; Is the service caring? Is the service responsive? Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service well led?

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our observations during the inspection, speaking with people using the service, the staff supporting them and from looking at records. We also spoke with Blackpool council�s contracts monitoring team and Healthwatch Blackpool who are an independent consumer champion for health and social care.

If you want to see the evidence supporting our summary please read our full report.

Is the service safe?

People told us they felt safe and their rights and dignity was respected. They told us they were receiving safe and appropriate care which was meeting their needs. Safeguarding procedures were in place and staff understood how to safeguard people they supported. The home had policies and procedures in relation to the Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. Relevant staff had been trained to understand when an application should be made and in how to submit one. This meant that people would be safeguarded as required.

The service was safe, clean and hygienic. Equipment had been maintained and serviced regularly ensuring people were not put at unnecessary risk. People living at the home told us they were happy and well looked after. We found recruitment practices were safe and thorough. This ensured people working for the home were fit to work with vulnerable people. Systems were in place to make sure the manager and her staff learnt from events such as accidents and incidents, complaints and concerns raised about the service.

Is the service effective?

There was an advocacy service available if people needed it, this meant that when required people could access additional support. People�s health and care needs had been assessed with them, and they were involved in writing their plans of care. Specialist dietary needs had been identified where required. Care plans had risk assessments completed to identify the potential risk of accidents and harm. Staff members we spoke with confirmed guidance was provided to ensure they provided safe and appropriate care. We found the care plans were flexible, regularly reviewed for their effectiveness and changed in recognition of the changing needs of the person. People spoken with said their care plans were up to date and reflected their current needs.

Is the service caring?

People were supported by kind and attentive staff. We saw care workers showed patience and gave encouragement when supporting people. The people we spoke with were very happy with the care being provided. One person said, �I haven�t been here very long but I have settled very quickly. The staff have been very kind and helpful. I have no concerns about anything.� Two people visiting their relative told us they were very happy with the home and had no concerns about the care provided. They said, �We are really glad we found this home after some bad experiences in two previous homes. It is obvious to us how much better off he is here.� Care plans had been maintained recording the care and support people were receiving. Good care practices were observed and people told us they were happy with the support they were receiving.

Is the service responsive?

Records showed admissions to the home were well planned. Information about people�s care and dietary needs had been recorded. We also saw potential risks to people�s health and welfare had been identified. Guidance had been provided for staff to ensure they provided safe and appropriate care. We found people completed a range of activities in and outside the service regularly. On the day of our inspection people were entertained by a singer in the afternoon. People we spoke with said they enjoyed the activities organised by the home. We found people had access to healthcare professionals. People received regular health checks with their General Practitioner and the outcome of these visits were recorded on their care records.

Is the service well-led?

The service had quality assurance systems in place. Records showed that identified problems and opportunities to change things for the better were addressed promptly. As a result the quality of the service was continuously improving. Staff had a good understanding of their roles and responsibilities. People we spoke with said they received a good quality service at all times.