• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Lambton House

New Lambton, Fence Houses, Houghton Le Spring, Tyne and Wear, DH4 6DE (0191) 385 5768

Provided and run by:
Mr Richard Coltman

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

24 April 2013

During a routine inspection

Before people went to live at the home assessments were carried out to establish the level of care required.

Mental Capacity assessments were carried out if there were concerns about someone who used the service. When a person did not have the capacity to consent to their care and treatment the provider told us they spoke with people's family or representatives to obtain consent for care.

Care plans were written in a personalised way with details about individual's needs and preferences.

Staff had developed positive relationships with individuals, and there was a relaxed and happy atmosphere in the home.

We were told the home continually monitored people's needs and risk assessments were carried to ensure ongoing staffing levels were appropriate for the people living in the home and the level of care they required.

The provider had introduced a new and comprehensive set of audits to the home. These audits covered areas such as portable appliance testing, smoke detectors, room temperature and water temperatures. There were different inspection sheets for each area of the home like bedrooms and the kitchen. The audits were to ensure high standards were met in and around the home.

30 November and 3 December 2012

During a routine inspection

People who used the service were happy with the care they received. One person told us "Carers are very nice, very helpful." another person told us "They're very good." One of the staff we spoke with told us "It's a really positive place."

We found people were generally happy although there were limited activities and some people said they were bored. Some people were concerned that if they wanted to participate in activities they had to go to the day centre within the home.

We saw staff at the home were respectful and courteous to people who lived there. Staff encouraged people to be independent and were knowledgeable about people's requirements.

People's special needs in relation to religious preferences were not sought and decisions were being made on behalf of people without seeking their opinions. We also found people were deemed to be unable to make decisions without any assessments being carried out to establish capacity.

Although the home was clean and tidy the provider had failed to act on the results of the inspections from the Primary Care Trust's infection control nurse meaning there was an increased risk of infection.

People's records were not detailed and did not hold relevant information, like visits from dentist, chiropodists and opticians.

19 January 2012

During a routine inspection

During our visit we spoke with people who use the service and with their relatives. They said staff respected their privacy and dignity. They told us staff knocked on their bedroom doors before entering and were polite in the way that they were talked to.

One person said, 'The staff are very kind and the manager is a helpful lady.'

People at the home said that they felt involved in decisions about their care.

One person told us, 'I didn't chose to live here but now I'm here it's fine and I like it.'

People said that staff helped them to take medicines safely.

One person said, 'Staff help me to look after my tablets.'

People at the home were happy with the support they received from staff. One person said, 'The staff are friendly and cheerful, they always seem to know what to say.'

People said that their care was monitored by the provider and the manager to make sure that it was good enough.

One person said, 'There isn't a problem talking to the manager in the office.'