- Homecare service
Archived: Complete Care Centre
All Inspections
03/04/2014
During a routine inspection
Complete Care Centre Limited is a domiciliary care provider that offers a service to a range individuals and families. In the main it provides a service to children and adults with disabilities, although not exclusively. During the time of this inspection it was providing care for approximately 22 people on a regular basis.
The needs of people using the services varied, but care was designed to meet individual circumstances. Some examples of the type of support provided included personal care for a few hours a day, supporting people when they attended college, and providing care over a full 24-hour period.
Although the provider was relatively small, we found that it provided a personal service to people. Staff had a good understanding of the individual requirements of each person using the service. The two current co-owners carried out some care themselves. People using the service liked the care they received as there was consistency and continuity.
We found that some of the record keeping was not up to date. Although staff told us they felt supported, there was a lack of record keeping around staff supervision or appraisals of their performance. The provider was in the process of reviewing people’s care plans and risk assessments; we noted that some of these had not been updated for over a year. Some policies and procedures were also out of date and contained out of date information, meaning staff did not have access to up to date information.
1 May 2013
During a routine inspection
We spoke to people who used the service or their representatives, carers who provide the direct support to people, office staff and a local authority commissioner.
People we spoke with were positive about the support that they received. They particularly enjoyed the level of continuity and consistency they received. We received comments such as, 'I'm happy with the service, no problems', and 'I always get the same worker'. The agency were able to provide this as they are a small independent concern with the owners completing a lot of the direct work themselves.
All the people we spoke with felt they were involved in decisions about the care being provided. People told us that they knew how to make a complaint if they needed to and that they would feel comfortable in doing so, if it became necessary.
There were some minor issues that we addressed with the agency and appear in the main body of the report.
3 May 2012
During a routine inspection
We spoke to three parents of the 21 people who use the service. All were positive including comments such as, 'best I've ever used, absolutely brilliant' and 'she's (the worker) is great, there is nothing wrong with the service that they provide'.
9 February 2011
During a routine inspection
The agency has a new manager, and at the time of inspecting, he had only been in post a number of weeks. The new manager had already identified some areas that they could improve upon, and with the inspector considered all the essential standards that need to be focused on.
The agency needs to focus on outcome 14 which relates to staff training and supervision. There are concerns that staff have not updated their training records or may have not undertaken training in particular areas. In addition, staff have received no formal supervision and for some of them it was over 18 months ago.
The agency needs also to focus on outcome 16 which, relates to quality assurance. Within this there must be more regular contact with people who use the service, including visits, to continually ascertain their views on the service that they are receiving.