• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Crann Mor Nursing Home

151 Old Woking Road, Woking, Surrey, GU22 8PD

Provided and run by:
Mr A Emambux and Mrs M Emambux

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

21 October 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We found that staff sought the consent of people using the service before any care was delivered. We also found that care records contained written confirmation of the person's consent to care or, where the person lacked capacity to consent, a relative or advocate had consented on their behalf. One person who used the service told us 'The staff always explain what they want to help me with and ask me if it's okay to go ahead.'

People's care was planned to ensure that the care received was appropriate and in accordance with the person's needs and wishes. We found that people's safety and welfare were protected by the planning of care and the presence of procedures to deal with foreseeable emergencies.

The premises were well maintained and safe. One person told us, 'My room was recently decorated'. Another said 'They have done a lot of work in the grounds recently, trimming back trees and things.'

There was sufficient, suitable equipment to allow staff to deliver care safely. The equipment we saw was, with one exception, well maintained. A member of care staff said 'There is enough equipment for us to use. Sometimes there may be a short delay while we wait for a hoist but that's unavoidable'.

We found that staff were supported through a system of regular appraisal and supervision.

The service had a complaints policy and procedure which meant that, should people have reason to complain, their complaint would be listened to and acted upon.

13 March 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with nine people and two relatives to find out their opinions of the service. Comments from people included, 'This place is absolutely wonderful, it's like home.'

People told us that consent was always obtained before care and treatment was carried out. However, we concluded that where people did not have the capacity to consent, the provider did not always act in accordance with legal requirements.

We concluded that people's needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual care plan.

We found that people who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening.

We found that the provider had not taken steps to provide care in an environment that was suitably designed and adequately maintained. People were not fully protected from unsafe or unsuitable equipment.

We concluded that suitable appraisal and supervision arrangements were not fully in place and staff did not always receive appropriate training for their professional development. We found that the registered manager was able, from time to time, to obtain further relevant qualifications to ensure he had the necessary experience and skills to manage the home.

We concluded that people's complaints were not always fully investigated and resolved, where possible, to their satisfaction.

20 February 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During this follow up inspection, we spoke to four residents. We also used a specially designed observation tool to review the services for people who have conditions that mean they cannot reliably give their verbal opinions on the services they receive.

The residents who spoke with us said that they were very happy and that staff were very kind. One resident said that there had been an increase in activities available and that there appeared to be more staff on duty.

22 September 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During this follow up inspection, we spoke to one resident and the visitor of one resident. We also used a specially designed observation tool to review the services for people who have conditions that mean they cannot reliably give their verbal opinions on the services they receive.

The resident who spoke with us indicated feeling safe and that the staff were very kind. The latter comment was also expressed by the visitor. We did hear some negative comments from residents who were seated in the lounge area related to the lack of activities in the day, feeling cold and hungry.

There was a request for additional equipment to assist in independence by the resident and positive comments in respect to the food made by both users of the service, which were shared with the manager.

The resident who spoke with us, told us that the range of activities had been limited in the home but more recently this had improved, though this person requested having the opportunity to undertake some physical exercises.

17 August 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During this follow up inspection, we spoke to two residents and used a specially designed observation tool to review the services for people who have conditions that mean they cannot reliably give their verbal opinions on the services they receive. Residents who spoke with us indicated that the care was good. One resident indicated that there was a limited number of staff to enable time to be freed up to sit and talk to residents.

The observational tool indicated that when interactions took place between staff and residents, that overall these were positive; however, there were limited staff available to engage with many residents and at times residents were left alone.

11 July 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During this follow up inspection, we spoke informally to a number of residents and the visiting relatives of one person. Comments made were good in relation to care delivery, the nursing and care staff. Relatives indicated to us that the staff were 'wonderful and very caring.' Relatives of one resident told us that the staff had spent a lot of time providing assistance and support to their relative.

23 February 2011

During a routine inspection

People using the services were in general happy with their care and treatment; though not all of the respondents felt involved in discussions regarding their care needs. Residents who responded to our questions felt that the staff were helpful and communicated well. The majority of those who spoke to us felt that there were opportunities to express personal preferences or to state if they were not happy about their care and treatment.

In relation to social activities, it was evident that some respondents did not know about the range of available social activities.

When we talked to people using the service about the provision of meals and quality of food, we had generally positive feedback. We were told that there is choice and that the food is good.

People who spoke to us said that the home was clean but there were some concerns about the fabric of the building.

Some of the people using the services did not know how the home monitors its standards or that there was a formal process for raising a complaint.