• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Royal Mencap Society - 15-16 Carlton Close

15-16 Carlton Close, Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 4HG (01636) 613731

Provided and run by:
Royal Mencap Society

All Inspections

4 December 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This inspection was carried out to follow up on our previous inspection in August 2013, where we found the provider had not been compliant with two out of the five areas we looked at.

Prior to our visit we reviewed all the information we had received from the provider, including an action plan detailing how they would comply with the compliance action we set at the previous inspection.

At this inspection the registered manager was not present but we spoke with them following our inspection. During our visit we spoke with two senior support workers, one in person and one on the telephone. We also spoke with a support worker. We looked at the support files of two people who used the service and the staff rota records held in the service.

We found the provider had made the required improvements to become fully compliant.

15, 16 August 2013

During a routine inspection

During this inspection we spoke with two people who used the service and three relatives for their views. We also spoke with the registered manager, a senior support worker and three support workers. We looked at service information, care plan files for four people and did a tour of both buildings.

People we spoke with told us they were happy with the care and support they received and felt their needs were well met. Comments included, 'It's nice here. I help with the shopping sometimes.' And, 'The staff are supporting me to go on holiday with another person in September to Butlins.'

We asked people about their experience of the meals provided. Comments included, 'We meet each week and do the menu, the staff are ok at cooking.'

We looked at the staff rota and found that sometimes people were at risk of not having their support needs met due to insufficient staff being available. A person who used the service told us, 'I like the staff they help if you've got any problems.' And, 'Sometimes we are short staffed it can't be helped.'

We looked at the procedures the provider undertook when recruiting new members of staff.

We looked at the internal audit systems in place. We saw from these records that people could be assured that checks on equipment, buildings and the service provided was regularly reviewed.

30 October 2012

During a routine inspection

We used observation as well as talking with people to help us understand the experiences of people using the service. Some of the people living at Carlton Close Care Home had communication needs. This meant they were not all able to tell us their experiences. We also spoke with three relatives, the registered manager, three members of staff and looked at service information and records.

On the day of our inspection there were 12 people living at Carlton Close Care Home. We saw three people during our inspection visit.

We saw staff supported people to participate in activities. People looked relaxed and happy with the staff supporting them. We saw one person was supported to go out in the community to the local park. This person was also supported to make their own lunch.

We observed lunchtime and saw people were given choices of what to eat and their choices were respected.

We spoke with three relatives of people who lived at the home. Comments told to us included, 'I'm really happy with the service provided. I know they (staff) involve her (relative) with everything.' And 'I'm invited to review meetings and I feel I'm involved. I've seen care plans and risk assessments.'

Other comments made were, 'I can't speak highly enough of the service. I wouldn't change it for the world.' And 'I visit regularly, communication with the staff is very good, I'm very impressed with their (staff) openness.'

12 October 2011

During a routine inspection

There were 11 people accommodated at the service at the time of our inspection.

We observed three people receiving support and spoke with the manager and three staff.

People who use the service could not tell us about their experiences, as they either lacked capacity or did not wish to comment.Therefore our judgements have been made on other evidence and observations.