• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Careline - The Agency For Care Staff

Kings Lodge, 194 Kings Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 4NH (0118) 958 5858

Provided and run by:
Mr David Anthony Fisher

All Inspections

17 June 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We found that improvements had been made to protect people against the risks associated with the management of medicines. As part of this inspection we looked at the medicine administration records and care plans for those people who received this support. We saw appropriate arrangements were in place for recording the administration of medicines. These records were clear and fully completed and documented that people had been given their prescribed medicines correctly.

6 June 2013

During a routine inspection

Many of the 30 people who use this service were unable to speak to us using the telephone. We spoke with four relatives of people who use the service and three members of care staff. We spoke with the manager as part of the inspection.

People said their relative's care needs were met by the service. They said the service was responsive to people's needs. One person said the service was "excellent."

Care planning involved external professionals, people who use the service and their representatives where appropriate. We saw external guidance had been used to provide staff with information on people's medical conditions.

Staff said they were not able to start working with people on their own until they completed the service's recruitment process. We saw all the appropropriate checks were completed before people began work. The service also provided staff with an induction before they could provide care.

People were aware of the complaints procedure and how they could contact the agency if necessary. The manager explained the complaints process and we saw information on complaints was provided to people when they began using the service. Complaints were logged, investigated and feedback was provided to people.

Care plans and management records were accurate and stored appropriately.

4 March 2013

During a routine inspection

People who use the service and their relatives told us they were involved in care planning and service reviews. They said staff sought their consent and communicated effectively. Where people lacked the capacity to consent to care we found the service made arrangements to ensure best interest decisions were made by appropriate representatives.

A relative told us care staff worked with health professionals to understand the needs of their relative and care for them effectively. Staff said they were made aware of the medical needs of people they cared for. We found staff worked with other health and social care professionals to ensure the care provided was appropriate. One person who used the service said "Staff understand care needs and are very cooperative."

Where staff administered medications they received appropriate training. However we found some arrangements in regards to assisting or prompting people to take medications did not include appropriate care planning, risk assessments or recording. Some staff who assisted or prompted the taking of medications had not received medication training.

10 January 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with the family representatives of a number of people receiving support and care from the agency. We spoke with an external healthcare professional who was involved in the team meeting one person's needs. Their feedback was very positive. People said that their relatives' needs were well met by the staff. They told us they had been fully involved in planning the care to be provided where the person themselves was unable to express their needs. People told us the agency provided good continuity of care and that where a change in staff had been necessary there had been a smooth transition.

People we spoke with said that the staff provided effective support and encouraged self-care and involvement in activities. We were told about the specialist training provided to the staff who supported one person to enable his medical needs to be met. People said that the staff worked positively with them and that the agency kept in regular contact. People had been asked their views about the quality of the service provided by the agency.