• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: The Bungalow - Lymm

6 Hardy Road, Lymm, Cheshire, WA13 0NX (01925) 751459

Provided and run by:
Community Care Matters Limited

All Inspections

5, 12 June 2014

During a routine inspection

We considered our inspection findings to answer questions we always ask;

' Is the service safe?

' Is the service effective?

' Is the service caring?

' Is the service responsive?

' Is the service well-led?

This is a summary of what we found-

Is the service safe?

Staff had received updated training in safeguarding and felt confident in being able to maintain people's safety and to safeguard people living at the service.

CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards which applies to care homes. While no applications had been submitted, the staff did have a good knowledge base regarding these safeguards. However they did not have access to appropriate policies and procedures in place including guidance on the 'Mental Capacity Act.' These documents are necessary to ensure the protection of vulnerable people who lacked ability to consent on various issues

Is the service effective?

Two relative's told us they were very happy with the care provided We observed the support being provided and it was clear the staff were knowledgeable of people's needs, in particular specialist forms of communication with people living at the service. We observed examples of good communication and patience by staff.

Staff discussed the individual needs of each person they supported including daily choices with social activities and in regard to the facilities to ensure people were comfortable and doing what they wanted to do.

Is the service caring?

Staff were friendly and helpful to the people they were supporting. We observed that people being supported were relaxed and happy in the company of their support staff and that staff fully understood their needs and ways of communicating.

We spoke with two relatives of people living at the service. They made various positive comments such as:

"I feel they are very good"; " My relative is thriving there, I trust them completely" and "We get that lovely feeling when we visit."

Is the service responsive?

Each person living at the service had an individualised support plan in place to help to show how their needs would be met at The Bungalow. These records were detailed and showed that people's choices and needs were being met and were regularly reviewed and updated to meet their needs.

Is the service well-led?

Relatives told us they were always kept informed and updated regarding their relatives support and needs.

The organisation and provider oversight of quality checks at the service were detailed and well managed to show on-going safe monitoring of the service.

20 February 2014

During a routine inspection

During our visit to the Bungalow we observed staff providing care and treatment; spoke to two people living in the home, to two staff and to two families. People living in the home looked happy and content and showed pleasure when staff suggested they engage in activities. Relatives commented "He seems very happy." Other relatives said "We are always made to feel welcome. It's just like his own home."

Staff had a good understanding of people's care needs. A wide range of activities and outings were evidenced through the home's photograph album including attendance at a music group, trips to Chester Zoo and holidays at Center Parcs.

When we visited the home was clean and tidy and had well organised regimes for cleaning and infection control.

Relatives were happy with the staff and one said "They care about them." The provider had an effective procedure for recruitment and selection of staff and appropriate checks were undertaken prior to staff commencing work.

People's care files were comprehensive and clearly identified people's needs and how they were to be supported. Daily records were updated several times during the day and night.

17 August 2012

During a routine inspection

We met two people living at The Bungalow in the morning of our visit.

We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of people using the service, because the people using the service had complex needs which meant they were not always able to verbally tell us about their experiences.

We were also accompanied and assisted by an expert by experience who is an experienced lay person who has expertise in this type of support.

People living at the service looked happy and comfortable with the staff supporting them. They looked happy when seeing staff they knew and they used non verbal signs to communicate with staff who knew their needs. Staff were friendly and respectful to the people they were supporting.

The expert by experience spoke to two relatives who were all very positive about the service and the standard of care provided. They made various positive comments such as;

'The staff are wonderful.'

'We fought for a long time to get (our relative here)' we would say if it was not right ,,,, it is perfect for (our relative) at The Bungalow ' we are very happy.'

'They are now comfortable in a way that I struggled to achieve.'

'I loved it from day 1 ' (our relative) has thrived ' thanks to the manager and staff working with their doctor, they have been taken off lots of medication and put on loads of weight ' I know that (our relative) is very happy now ' there is a contentedness around them.'

'I do feel (our relative) is safe.'

'I trust them.'

'Family members often call at the Bungalow unexpectedly ' we do not make appointments ' never any worries about this.'

'I suspect (our relative) is treated well ' I have no worries about this.'