The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Brewer Street Surgery Also known as Brewer Street Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

4 Brewer Street, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 1RU (01622) 755401

Provided and run by:
Brewer Street Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Brewer Street Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Brewer Street Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

17 July 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Brewer Street Surgery on 17 July 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

7 December 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Drs Johnson, Garrett & Mitchell (also known as Brewer Street Surgery) on 7 December 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.

  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

  • Translation services were available to patients whose first language was not English.

  • The practice had developed a wide range of other services for patients. The practice objective was to place the patients at the heart of the services, rather than the patients being sent through the health care system to access the services.

  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Ensure that staff are aware of what constitutes a ‘near miss’ in terms of incident reporting.

  • Continue to ensure the recording of medicines used during minor surgery are appropriately recorded.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice