We carried out a review of the data available to us about Wargrave House Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Wargrave House Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wargrave House Surgery on 1 November 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.
Our key findings across all of the areas we inspected were as follows:
Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded including lessons learned.
Safe arrangements were in place for staff recruitment that protected patients from risks of harm. The numbers of staff were regularly reviewed to enable them to meet patients’ needs. The practice manager left in July 2016 and senior staff were in the process of recruiting. The assistant practice manager was fulfilling the role temporarily.
There were on-going arrangements were in place to protect patients and others from unnecessary infections.
Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training had been encouraged and planned.
Patients told us they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in decisions about their treatment.
Senior staff had responded to the previous results of the National Patient Survey regarding access for appointments. A new appointment system was introduced in May 2016 and this was being monitored for effectiveness. All patients who requested same day appointments were triaged to ensure they received appropriate and timely care.
Information about how to make a complaint was readily available and easy to understand. Complaints received were dealt with appropriately.
There was a clear leadership structure and staff told us they felt well supported by senior staff. Management sought feedback from patients which it acted on.
The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
Chief Inspector of General Practice
We saw that patients' views and experiences were taken into account in the way the service was provided and that they were treated with dignity and respect.
The surgery was based over two floors of a large listed high street building. The provider had created ramped access at the rear of the building and patients with mobility difficulties could choose to be treated on the ground floor.
The surgery looked clean and we saw that there were good processes in place to minimise the risk of cross infection.
We were satisfied that the provider made all the appropriate checks on staff before their full employment started. The practice manager regularly checked to ensure that healthcare professionals employed at the surgery were correctly registered with their appropriate professional body.
The surgery had a well-publicised complaints system and we saw that complaints were dealt with appropriately.