• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Comfort Keepers UK

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

195 - 199 Heene Road, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 4NN

Provided and run by:
Sodexo Home Care Services UK Limited

All Inspections

22 November 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on the 22 and 23 November 2016 and was announced.

Comfort Keepers UK is a domiciliary care service which provides personal care to people in their own homes. The registered office is in Worthing, however the service provides personal care to people across West Sussex including Worthing, Shoreham-By-Sea and Lancing. The service supported older people, people living with dementia, people with a physical disability and/or a sensory impairment. At the time of our visit, the service was supporting 120 people with personal care. The total number of people changed frequently due to the service regularly supporting people who had been discharged from hospital and who required short term care and support.

The registered manager had been in post since August 2012. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Each person had a completed care record which was kept in their homes for staff to use to meet their care needs. However, during our inspection, we found there were gaps in information held at the registered office with regard to the care and treatment the service was providing to people. This included gaps within care plans, risk assessments and how people were supported with their prescribed medicines. This meant the office were not able to monitor and audit the quality of the care provided consistently for all people. We made a recommendation to the provider so the appropriate action was taken to ensure completed care records were held at the registered office. The registered manager was prompt in responding to this issue and told us the action she would take to rectify this.

People told us that Comfort Keepers UK provided a safe service. Staff were able to speak about what action they would take if they had a concern or felt a person was at risk of potential abuse or neglect. People and relatives spoke positively about the support they received from the service and records reflected there were sufficient staff to meet people’s needs. The service followed safe recruitment practices. People’s medicines were managed safely within people’s own homes.

Risks to people had been identified and assessed and information was provided in people's homes for staff on how to care for people safely and mitigate any risks.

Staff felt confident with the support and guidance they had been given during their induction and subsequent training. Supervisions, appraisals and competency assessments were consistently carried out for all staff supporting people.

People’s consent to care and treatment was considered under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 when providing care. Some people received support with food and drink and they made positive comments about staff and the way they met this need.

Staff spoke kindly and respectfully to people as well as involving them with the care provided. Staff had developed meaningful relationships with people they supported. Staff knew people well and had a caring approach. People were treated with dignity and respect.

Changes in people’s health care needs and their support was reviewed when required. If people required input from other healthcare professionals, this was arranged.

People received personalised care. People’s care had been planned and individual care plans were in place. Care plans provided clear guidance to staff on how to meet people’s individual needs. People were involved in reviewing care plans with the management team.

People’s views about the quality of the service were obtained informally through discussions with the management team, care reviews and formally through surveys.

People told us that they knew who to go to make a complaint and how they would do so if and when they required. People told us they were pleased with improvements the service had made with regard to sending the same staff on care visits.

During the inspection we found the registered manager open to feedback and prompt in taking action to improve the experience of care people received.

13 June 2014

During an inspection in response to concerns

CQC carried out a responsive inspection at Comfort Keepers following receipt of concerns about staff training and record-keeping. This was an inspection to whether Comfort Keepers were compliant in these areas.

An adult social care inspection manager carried out this visit. As part of this inspection we spoke with two staff members and the registered manager. We also attempted to contact three additional staff but could not reach them. We did speak to people who used services at this inspection because our responsive inspection was focused on staff training and record keeping. We also looked at three care plans, daily care records and three staff records.

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary describes what people using the service, their relatives and the staff told us, what we observed and the records we looked at.

2 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with the manager and four members of staff. We also spoke with two people who used the service and 4 of their relatives. There were 13 people using the services in total and 13 members of staff. The manager spoke with us about the plans to gradually increase the number of people being supported by the agency.

The people we spoke with were very happy with the service they received and one relative said 'we have never had a bad carer from Comfort Keepers'. One relative reported that she had spoken to a person who used the service who had said the staff were 'really kind and that they give me confidence'. The relative said she had been anxious about a relative receiving care but was 'very impressed' with the service and found them to be 'patient and accommodating'. The relative said that the manager is 'attentive and always answers the telephone'.

We found that the agency had effective systems and policies and staff were happy in their work and well trained and supported.