You are here

Hope Homecare Services Limited Good

This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Inspection Summary


Overall summary & rating

Good

Updated 28 November 2017

This inspection site visit took place on 03 November 2017 and was unannounced.

Hope Homecare is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. It provides a service to older adults and younger disabled adults. Not everyone using Hope Homecare receives a regulated activity; Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’ such as help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of this inspection 54 people received support with their personal care.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

When we previously inspected the service on12 August 2016 we found that the care and support people received was not always safe. People`s consent and principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 were not always followed by staff and the providers governance systems were not always effective to identify and improve shortfalls. Following the inspection the registered manager submitted an action plan which detailed how they were going to implement and sustain the necessary improvement.

At this inspection we found that the provider and the registered manager had made the necessary improvements to ensure people received care and support in a safe, effective and personalised way.

The provider implemented a multi - functional care management system called PASS. The system had multiple functionalities and enabled the registered manager and the provider to run an effective and safe service. The system enabled staff to access people`s electronic care records and also provided effective rostering and call monitoring data for the provider. Care staff used their phone which was password protected and enabled them to access and review information as well as to complete daily log notes.

People told us they felt safe with the care and support they received from the staff. Staff had been trained and appropriately supported to carry out their roles effectively. They knew how to safeguard people from avoidable harm and about the potential risks and signs of abuse. Risks to people's health, well-being or safety were assessed and regularly reviewed to take account of people's changing needs and circumstances. There were enough staff available to meet people’s needs and safe recruitment practices were followed to help make sure that staff were suitable for the roles they performed. People who needed staff to administer their medicines had these in time and staff followed best practice guidance when supporting people to take their medicines.

Staff took appropriate actions to protect people from the risk of infection by using appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when supporting people with personal care. The registered manager and the provider demonstrated an open culture of learning from complaints and previous shortfalls identified.

People told us they were asked for their permission before staff assisted them with care or support. Where people were able they signed their own care records and they could access these on line or in a paper format. Where it was appropriate people`s relatives were involved in their care and staff followed the principles of MCA to help ensure the care and support people received was in their best interest.

People and their relatives told us that the staff providing care and support to people were kind and compassionate. Staff respected people’s dignity and encouraged them to remain as independent as possible. People received care, as much as possible, from the same care staff or team of care staff members. People had regular opportunities to feedback about the service and to participate in reviews of their care and support needs.

People and their relatives felt that the registered manager was approachable with any concerns. All the people we spoke with told us that they felt that Hope Homecare was well managed and said that they would recommend the service to other people. The provider demonstrated a good knowledge of the staff they employed and people who used the service. Staff told us that the management team was approachable, supportive and that they could talk to them at any time. There was a programme of checks undertaken routinely to help ensure that the service provided for people was safe.

Inspection areas

Safe

Good

Updated 28 November 2017

The service was safe.

Systems were in place to alert staff and the registered manager at the earliest opportunity of any late or missed care calls.

People felt safe and were supported by staff who had been trained to recognise and respond effectively to potential abuse.

Risks to people's health and wellbeing were identified and assessed, with appropriate actions taken to minimise risk of harm.

Safe and effective recruitment practices were followed to ensure that all staff were fit, able and qualified to do their jobs.

Staff protected people from the risk of infections by following universal precaution procedures.

People`s medicines were managed safely and effectively by trained staff who had their competencies checked regularly.

Effective

Good

Updated 28 November 2017

The service was effective.

Staff were provided with appropriate training and support to help them meet people's needs effectively.

People's consent and permission was obtained before care and support was provided. Where people were unable to make decisions relating to their care the service followed the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to ensure the care people received was in their best interest.

Staff supported some people at mealtimes to have food and drink of their choice.

People were supported to meet their day to day health needs and to access health care professionals when necessary.

Caring

Good

Updated 28 November 2017

The service was caring.

People were supported in a kind and compassionate way by staff who knew them well and were familiar with their needs.

People were fully involved in the planning, delivery and reviews of their support.

Support was provided in a way that promoted people's dignity and respected their privacy.

Responsive

Good

Updated 28 November 2017

The service was responsive.

People had an assessment of their needs prior to care commencing and their care was reviewed regularly to ensure their needs were constantly met.

People and their relatives where appropriate, had been involved in developing people's care plans.

People told us that staff supported them to pursue their own interests or pursuits, and would willingly take on additional tasks when required.

People's care plans were sufficiently detailed to be able to guide staff to provide their individual care needs.

Concerns and complaints raised by people who used the service or their relatives were appropriately investigated and resolved.

Well-led

Good

Updated 28 November 2017

The service was well led.

People and their relatives knew the registered manager and the provider by name and felt that they were approachable with any concerns.

All the people we spoke with told us that they felt Hope Homecare was well managed, well run and that they would recommend the service to other people.

The provider demonstrated an in-depth knowledge of the staff they employed and people who used the service.

Staff told us that the registered manager and senior staff team was approachable and that they could talk to them at any time.

There were a range of checks undertaken routinely to help ensure that the service provided for people was safe.

People were given regular opportunities to provide feedback about the service they received.

The service worked in partnership with other health and social care professionals involved in people`s care to ensure the care people received met their needs fully.