• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Sova Healthcare Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

18 East Parade, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD1 5EE (01274) 309543

Provided and run by:
Sova Healthcare Ltd

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Sova Healthcare Ltd on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Sova Healthcare Ltd, you can give feedback on this service.

28 December 2018

During a routine inspection

Sova Healthcare Limited is registered as a domiciliary care agency. The agency is based in Bradford and provides a range of services including personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. At the time of inspection the agency was providing care and support to 37 people.

We inspected Sova Healthcare Limited between 28 December 2018 and 18 January 2019. During this period we visited the office premises and spoke with people who used the service and care workers. We announced the inspection 48 hours prior to the start of the inspection to make sure the registered manager would be available.

Our last inspection took place on 9 May 2016 and at that time the service was rated ‘Good’ overall. Following this inspection, the service remains ‘Good’ overall with no breaches of regulation.

At the time of inspection there was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found care workers received training to protect people from harm and they were knowledgeable about reporting any suspected harm. Care workers told us the training provided by the agency was very good and they received the training and support required to carry out their roles effectively.

Where risks to people’s health, safety and welfare had been identified appropriate risk assessments were in place which showed what action had been taken to mitigate the risk.

The feedback we received from people who used the service or their relatives about the standard of care provided was consistently good and people told us care workers were reliable and conscientious.

The support plans we looked at were person centred and were reviewed on a regular basis to make sure they provided accurate and up to date information. The care workers we spoke with told us they used the support plans as working documents and they provided sufficient information to enable them to carry out their role effectively and in people's best interest.

If people required care workers to assist or support them to prepare food and drink information was present within their support plan and care workers told us they encouraged people to eat a healthy diet.

There were a sufficient number of care workers employed for operational purposes and the recruitment process ensured only people suitable to work in the caring profession were employed. Care workers were able to describe how individual people preferred their care and support delivered and the importance of treating people with respect in their own homes.

The registered manager demonstrated a good understanding of their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and care workers demonstrated good knowledge of the people they supported and their capacity to make decisions.

There was a complaints procedure available which enabled people to raise any concerns or complaints about the care or support they received. People told us they felt able to raise any concerns with the registered manager and felt these would be listened to and responded to effectively and in a timely manner.

There was a quality assurance monitoring system in place that was designed to continually monitor and identify shortfalls in service provision. People who used the service and care workers spoke positively about the management team and we found there was an open and transparent culture within the service.

9 May 2016

During a routine inspection

We inspected Sova Healthcare Limited on the 9 May 2016. The visit was made at short notice to make sure the registered manager would be available. This was the first inspection of the service since registration.

Sova Healthcare Limited is registered as a domiciliary care agency and provides a range of services including personal care. Although the agency is based in Bradford they operate in Leeds and throughout West Yorkshire. At the time of inspection the agency were only providing care and support to three people.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The staff we spoke with were able to describe how individual people preferred their care and support to be delivered and the importance of treating people with respect in their own homes.

The feedback we received from relatives about the standard of care was consistently good. We saw that people were supported by regular staff. This consistency enabled care staff to develop meaningful relationships with the people they supported.

The support plans we looked at were person centred and were reviewed on a regular basis to make sure they provided accurate and up to date information. The staff we spoke with told us they used the support plans as working documents and they provided sufficient information to enable them to carry out their role effectively and in people's best interest.

The registered manager demonstrated a good understanding of their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and staff showed a good knowledge of the people they supported and their capacity to make decisions.

There were clear lines of communication and accountability within the agency and staff were supported through a planned programme of supervision and training.

There was a complaints procedure available which enabled people to raise any concerns or complaints about the care or support they received.

There was a quality assurance monitoring system in place that was designed to continually monitor and identify shortfalls in service provision. Audit results were analysed for themes and trends and there was evidence learning from incidents took place and appropriate changes were made to procedures or work practices if required.