• Ambulance service

Aero Medical Ambulance Service

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

71 The Crescent, Abbots Langley, Hertfordshire, WD5 0DR 07717 478646

Provided and run by:
Mind and Behaviour Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 28 June 2021

Aero Medical Ambulance Service is operated by Mind and Behaviour Limited. The service provides patient transport services. It is an independent provider of non-emergency private ambulance. The services covered includes short and long-distance ambulance journeys within the greater London and surrounding areas. The largest proportion of clients are transferred between hospitals or care homes and transfers to or from a patient’s home and a hospital.

The service does not provide an emergency response service.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out the announced part of the inspection on 23 April 2021.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led?

Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

The main service provided by this service was patient transport services.

We rated this service as Good overall.

The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well.

The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.

Staff provided good care and treatment. The manager monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients and had access to good information. The service was available seven days a week.

The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and enabled people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for transfers.

The manager supported staff to develop their skills. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

However:

Although the manager had oversight of the service and managed performance of the service effectively these were not formalised or documented effectively. They identified relevant risks and issues and identified actions to reduce their impact but there was no formalised risk management process in place.

There were limited formalised policies and procedures although the manager did have processes in place. Not all policies we reviewed were version controlled or within review date.

The service manager was in the process of updating and formalising their governance structure; however, this was yet to be finalised and embedded. Following this inspection, we told the provider that it must take some actions to comply with the regulations and that it should make other improvements, even though a regulation had not been breached, to help the service improve. We also issued the provider with one requirement notice that affected patient transport services. Details are at the end of the report.

Fiona Allinson

Deputy Chief Inspector of Hospitals, on behalf of the Chief Inspector of Hospitals