• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Oaklands Care Home Limited

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

34A-34B Church Road, Brightlingsea, Colchester, Essex, CO7 0JF (01206) 305622

Provided and run by:
Oaklands Care Home Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

16 October 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 16 October 2017 and was unannounced.

Oaklands Care Home provides accommodation with care for up to 14 older people. Care is provided over two floors. At the time of our inspection there were 13 people living at the service

A registered manager was in post at the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Risks to people’s health and well-being were not fully recorded or followed so that they could be managed safely. Professional advice was not being followed in relation to a person’s nutrition.

The service did not have in place a process for the safe recruitment of staff. Staff were being recruited without the required employment checks in place to ensure they were able to work with people in a social care setting.

Training had not been developed to reflect the deterioration of people and staff did not always demonstrate they knew how to provide the right care.

We recommended that the provider develop their training with reference to a reputable source around dementia care and best practice within care homes.

Systems were not in place to make sure the rights of people who may lack capacity to make particular decisions were protected.

People were not always treated with dignity and respect and their independence encouraged. Care was not always person centred to meet their needs.

The quality assurance audits were not sufficiently robust to ensure that people received a service which met their needs and protected their safety.

There were sufficient numbers of care staff to care for people at the service.

People’s physical and mental health needs were assessed, monitored and met in order for them to live well. The service worked closely with relevant health care professionals. Generally, people received the support they needed to have a healthy diet that met their individual needs.

People were cared for by staff who knew them well. People and their relatives were able to raise concerns and give their views and opinions and these were listened to and acted upon. The registered manager was not aware of the requirements of the Accessible Information Standard but, however, they were meeting people’s sensory and communication needs.

The registered manager was visible in the service and worked well together with a consistent team of staff. People were cared for by staff who were enthusiastic and supported.

15 November 2016

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection of this service on 19 October 2015. Two breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 were found. After the comprehensive inspection, the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet the legal requirements in relation to the safe administration of medicines and premises and equipment.

We undertook this follow up inspection on 15 November 2016 to check that they had made the necessary improvements.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Oaklands Care Home Limited on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Oaklands Care Home Limited is a residential care home that provides accommodation and personal care for up 14 people, some of whom may have needs associated with dementia.

A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Improvements had been made to the service. People's medicines were managed safely and staff received training and support in order to maintain their knowledge and skills.

Systems to monitor the maintenance of the premises and ensure that equipment was in good working order were in place so that people had a safe place to live and maintain their health and independence.

There were sufficient staff who had been recruited safely and who had the skills and knowledge to provide care and support in ways that people preferred. Staff had received training in keeping people safe and they knew how to raise any concerns if they suspected someone was at risk of abuse or harm. Staff understood the risks people could face day to day and how to ensure their safety.

There were systems to monitor and improve the quality of the service. Checks were carried out to ensure care was delivered safely and effectively.

19 October 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on the 19 October 2015 and was unannounced.

The service provides accommodation for up to fourteen older people. There were thirteen older people using the service at the time of our inspection. There was a registered manager in post.

A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

During our inspection we observed kind, considerate care by staff who were experienced and knowledgeable about the people they were supporting. People told us they were satisfied with the service and we saw there was a quality assurance process in place to assess the effectiveness of the service. This took into account people’s views so the service could be provided around people’s needs. This was strengthened by having care plans which told staff about people’s wishes and choices to help staff provide person centred care. However some care plans viewed were contradictory.

There were enough staff to meet people’s needs but the redeployment of staff at lunch time and to help assist with more activities would be advantageous.

People received their medicines from staff who were trained to administer them safely. However medicines were not always safely secured and there was not always appropriate guidance

about how people should have their medicines.

Staff were well supported by the manager and received regular training and support. There was an adequate induction programme and effective recruitment process so only suitable staff were employed.

The manager had an effective complaints procedure and involved people in decision making.

People’s health care needs were monitored and risks to people’s safety were reduced as far as possible. Staff knew what actions they should take if they suspected a person to be at risk of harm or abuse and how to promote people’s safety.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required by law to monitor the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which applies to care homes. The provider, manager and staff had an understanding of their responsibilities and processes of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. The manager had a good understanding of the MCA and DOLS and was acting lawfully.

The manager was highly thought of and often provided direct care to people. However we were not assured that the audit processes were sufficiently robust as we identified issues with cleanliness, maintenance and a number of care practices and care records which had not always been identified by the provider.

We found a breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we have told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

7 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We talked to two people living in the home, they told us they liked living there. People told us that the staff were nice and that they supported them to do the activities that they like. One person told us "The food is brilliant."

We observed that staff were attentive to people`s needs and treated them with respect and dignity calling them by their name. One person told us "I feel safe here. The staff are very kind and helpful."

We saw that staff sought people`s agreement before providing any support and assistance.

We saw that there was a sufficient number and mix of senior and junior care staff available throughout the day and night. We saw that there were also ancillary staff regularly on duty.

We saw that there was a robust complaints policy in place, which was readily available in the entrance hall.

9 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We saw staff interacting with people used the service, listening to them and responding to them in a polite and courteous way, ensuring that they given time to ask questions and respond at their own pace. We also saw that staff supported and gently encouraged people to eat and drink at their own pace.

People's needs were assessed and peoples likes and dislikes were identified including, the time they like to get up and go to bed, what they like to eat and drink. One person who used the service said "I feel safe living here staff are always here with me." Another person said "I like going out into the garden when it is nice, staff take me out there when I ask."

Staff we spoke to told us that they received regular supervision, one person said "The senior staff are approachable and very supportive. We saw that staff received regular training and updates.

We saw the provider regularly assesses and monitors the quality of the service provided to protect people who used the service from the risk of inappropriate or unsafe care and treatment. Monthly audits are carried out reviewing the key areas such as care plans, risk assessment, medication, accidents, incidents, compliments and complaints, fire safety and the building environment. Any areas for improvement are identified and the appropriate action to address any concerns and identify areas of good practice.

17 October 2011

During a routine inspection

During our visit to Oaklands Care Home on 17 October 2011 we spoke with a number of people. One person told us 'I can't find fault. They're very good. The food is good. We get a good meal every time and we have two choices. The staff are all good.' A relative told us 'We are very pleased with the home. They keep them nice and clean and the care is very good. X sees the general practitioner (GP) when X needs to. They help X with eating and the carers are always there.' People we spoke with told us that they had their hair done by the hairdresser and had their feet treated regularly by the chiropodist. A relative told us that they saw residents taking part in activities when they visited and said 'They have a lovely party at Christmas.' One person we spoke with told us they were happy living at the home and liked their room. They told us 'It is a very good home.' Another person told us 'I'm quite happy here.' One person told us 'It is always lovely and clean. There is never a smell.'